The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaillon, L., Poon, C. S., & Chiang, Y. H. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015 · Cited by 592
Construction Waste: Quantification and Source Evaluation
Bossink, B. A. G., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (1996) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1996)122:1(55 · Cited by 578
Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management
Yuan, H., & Shen, L. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030 · Cited by 574
Self-citationA review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling
Tam, V. W. Y., & Tam, C. M. (2006) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.002 · Cited by 477
Modelling municipal solid waste generation: A review
Beigl, P., Lebersorger, S., & Salhofer, S. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.011 · Cited by 435
Material Waste in Building Industry: Main Causes and Prevention
Formoso, C. T., Soibelman, L., De Cesare, C., & Isatto, E. L. (2002) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:4(316 · Cited by 434
A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste estimation and planning
Cheng, J. C. P., & Ma, L. Y. H. (2013) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.001 · Cited by 402
A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste
Solís-Guzmán, J., Marrero, M., Montes-Delgado, M. V., & Ramírez-de-Arellano, A. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.009 · Cited by 359
A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction
Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018 · Cited by 353
Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand
Kofoworola, O. F., & Gheewala, S. H. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.004 · Cited by 346
Cited by
Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends
Bilal, M., Oyedele, L. O., Qadir, J., Munir, K., Ajayi, S. O., Akinade, O. O., Owolabi, H. A., Alaka, H. A., & Pasha, M. (2016) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001 · Cited by 734
A review on current situation and challenges of construction and demolition waste management
Menegaki, M., & Damigos, D. (2018) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.010 · Cited by 512
Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review
Augiseau, V., & Barles, S. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.002 · Cited by 308
Waste minimisation through deconstruction: A BIM based Deconstructability Assessment Score (BIM-DAS)
Akinade, O. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Ajayi, S. O., Owolabi, H. A., Alaka, H. A., & Bello, S. A. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.018 · Cited by 272
Challenges in current construction and demolition waste recycling: A China study
Ma, M., Tam, V. W. Y., Le, K. N., & Li, W. (2020) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.030 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Z., Yu, A. T. W., Shen, L., & Liu, G.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1683-1692
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992709014
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 25.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010
- The paper
- Wu, Z., Yu, A. T. W., Shen, L., & Liu, G. (2014). Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
