The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urban Particle Capture in Bioretention Media. I: Laboratory and Field Studies
Abstract
Bioretention is a novel stormwater best-management practice that uses a mixture of soil/sand/mulch as adsorptive filtration media that can capture both urban particulates and dissolved pollutants while promoting infiltration. This study conducted a series of laboratory column experiments and field observations, which showed that: (1) bioretention media stratification occurs with runoff percolation due to particulate deposition; (2) bioretention filter media are clogging limited, instead of breakthrough limited; and (3) both depth filtration and cake filtration significantly contribute to urban particle capture. Because of the fine size of bioretention media, incoming suspended solids cannot significantly penetrate below 5–10cm of the media in the column tests and approximately 20cm in the monitored field facility. Bioretention filters under intermittent flow conditions exhibited higher solids loading capacity (in kg∕m2 ) before clogging than under continuous flow conditions. The clay components in incoming total suspended solids assume critical responsibility for bioretention media clogging. The media resistance due to solids deposition was estimated through Darcy’s law. The hydraulic conductivity of two media types decreased from 54±23 and 72±46cm∕h to less than 10cm∕h due to particle capture. Experimental results suggest that a 20-cm media depth is sufficient for bioretention design and maintenance procedures (media replacement) for runoff particle capture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil hydraulic properties influenced by stiff-stemmed grass hedge systems
Rachman, A., Anderson, S. H., Gantzer, C. J., & Alberts, E. E. (2004) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1386 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Field Performance of Bioretention: Water Quality
Davis, A. P. (2007) · Environmental Engineering Science · doi:10.1089/ees.2006.0190 · Cited by 306
Self-citationMeeting hydrologic and water quality goals through targeted bioretention design
Hunt, W. F., Davis, A. P., & Traver, R. G. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000504 · Cited by 272
Self-citationReview and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater
Liu, J., Sample, D., Bell, C., & Guan, Y. (2014) · Water · doi:10.3390/w6041069 · Cited by 269
Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention
Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000026 · Cited by 238
Self-citationBioretention cells remove microplastics from urban stormwater
Smyth, K., Drake, J., Li, Y., Rochman, C., Van Seters, T., & Passeport, E. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116785 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., & Davis, A. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Engineering
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 409-418
- ISSN
- 0733-9372 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7870
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2008)134:6(409
- OpenAlex
- W1964044132
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urban Particle Capture in Bioretention Media. I: Laboratory and Field Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2008)134:6(409
- The paper
- Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2008). Urban Particle Capture in Bioretention Media. I: Laboratory and Field Studies. Journal of Environmental Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2008)134%3A6(409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.