The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asymptotic Expansions for Reliability and Moments of Uncertain Systems
Abstract
An asymptotic approximation is developed for evaluating the probability integrals that arise in the determination of the reliability and response moments of uncertain dynamic systems subject to stochastic excitation. The method is applicable when the probabilities of failure or response moments conditional on the system parameters are available, and the effect of the uncertainty in the system parameters is to be investigated. In particular, a simple analytical formula for the probability of failure of the system is derived and compared to some existing approximations, including an asymptotic approximation based on second-order reliability methods. Simple analytical formulas are also derived for the sensitivity of the failure probability and response moments to variations in parameters of interest. Conditions for which the proposed asymptotic expansion is expected to be accurate are presented. Since numerical integration is only computationally feasible for investigating the accuracy of the proposed method for a small number of uncertain system parameters, simulation techniques are also used. A simple importance sampling method is shown to converge much more rapidly than straightforward Monte Carlo simulation. Simple structures subjected to white noise stochastic excitation are used to illustrate the accuracy of the proposed analytical approximation. Results from the computationally efficient perturbation method are also included for comparison. The results show that the asymptotic method gives acceptable approximations, even for systems with relatively large uncertainty, and in most cases, it outperforms the perturbation method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method
Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2016) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118631980 · Cited by 3,356
Cited by
Model Selection Using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach
Beck, J. L., & Yuen, K.-V. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192 · Cited by 607
Self-citationDealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review
Simoen, E., De Roeck, G., & Lombaert, G. (2015) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001 · Cited by 540
Bayesian Probabilistic Approach to Structural Health Monitoring
Vanik, M. W., Beck, J. L., & Au, S. K. (2000) · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126:7(738 · Cited by 437
Self-citationGiaralis, A., & Taflanidis, A. A. (2018) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2082 · Cited by 328
Updating robust reliability using structural test data
Papadimitriou, C., Beck, J. L., & Katafygiotis, L. S. (2001) · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1016/s0266-8920(00)00012-6 · Cited by 287
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Papadimitriou, C., Beck, J. L., & Katafygiotis, L. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1219-1229
- ISSN
- 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7889
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1997)123:12(1219
- OpenAlex
- W2040390190
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymptotic Expansions for Reliability and Moments of Uncertain Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1997)123:12(1219
- The paper
- Papadimitriou, C., Beck, J. L., & Katafygiotis, L. S. (1997). Asymptotic Expansions for Reliability and Moments of Uncertain Systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1997)123%3A12(1219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.