The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a statistical analysis of structural fragility curves. Both empirical and analytical fragility curves are considered. The empirical fragility curves are developed utilizing bridge damage data obtained from the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake. The analytical fragility curves are constructed on the basis of the nonlinear dynamic analysis. Two-parameter lognormal distribution functions are used to represent the fragility curves with the parameters estimated by the maximum likelihood method. This paper also presents methods of testing the goodness of fit of the fragility curves and estimating the confidence intervals of the two parameters (median and log-standard deviation) of the distribution. An analytical interpretation of randomness and uncertainty associated with the median is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems
Arghandeh, R., von Meier, A., Mehrmanesh, L., & Mili, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.193 · Cited by 404
Chen, J., Tang, H., Ge, J., & Pan, Y. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14061358 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., & Naganuma, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1224-1231
- ISSN
- 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7889
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224
- OpenAlex
- W1998806251
- Cited by
- 1,146
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224
- The paper
- Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., & Naganuma, T. (2000). Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126%3A12(1224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
