Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 851

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation

Beck, James L., Au, Siu-Kui·2002·Journal of Engineering Mechanics
DOI 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380

Abstract

In a full Bayesian probabilistic framework for “robust” system identification, structural response predictions and performance reliability are updated using structural test data 𝒟 by considering the predictions of a whole set of possible structural models that are weighted by their updated probability. This involves integrating h(θ)p(θ|𝒟) over the whole parameter space, where θ is a parameter vector defining each model within the set of possible models of the structure, h(θ) is a model prediction of a response quantity of interest, and p(θ|𝒟) is the updated probability density for θ, which provides a measure of how plausible each model is given the data 𝒟. The evaluation of this integral is difficult because the dimension of the parameter space is usually too large for direct numerical integration and p(θ|𝒟) is concentrated in a small region in the parameter space and only known up to a scaling constant. An adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation approach is proposed to evaluate the desired integral that is based on the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm and a concept similar to simulated annealing. By carrying out a series of Markov chain simulations with limiting stationary distributions equal to a sequence of intermediate probability densities that converge on p(θ|𝒟), the region of concentration of p(θ|𝒟) is gradually portrayed. The Markov chain samples are used to estimate the desired integral by statistical averaging. The method is illustrated using simulated dynamic test data to update the robust response variance and reliability of a moment-resisting frame for two cases: one where the model is only locally identifiable based on the data and the other where it is unidentifiable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380)

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 851

Metadata

Authors
Beck, J. L., & Au, S.-K.
Venue
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Published
2002-04
Volume
128
Issue
4
Pages
380-391
ISSN
  • 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7889
DOI
10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380
OpenAlex
W2038817616
Cited by
851
References
3
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380
The paper
Beck, J. L., & Au, S.-K. (2002). Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128%3A4(380

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.