The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benchmark Problem for Response Control of Wind-Excited Tall Buildings
Abstract
This paper presents an overview and problem definition of a benchmark problem for the response control of wind-excited tall buildings. The building considered is a 76-story 306 m concrete office tower proposed for the city of Melbourne, Australia. The building is slender with a height to width ratio of 7.3; hence, it is wind sensitive. Wind tunnel tests for such a 76-story building model have been conducted at the University of Sydney and the results of across-wind data are used in the present benchmark problem. Either active, semiactive, or passive control systems can be installed in the building to reduce the wind response, although only an active control sample problem has been worked out to illustrate the control design. In the case of active control systems, either an active tuned mass damper or an active mass driver can be installed on the top floor. In the case of passive or semiactive systems, such as viscous dampers, viscoelastic dampers, electrorheological, or magnetorheological dampers, etc., control devices can be installed in selected story units. Control constraints and evaluation criteria are presented for the design problem. A simulation program based on the linear quadratic Gaussian technique has been developed and made available for the comparison of the performance of various control strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid–structure interaction
Sotiropoulos, F., & Yang, X. (2014) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.09.003 · Cited by 473
Wind-Induced Vibration Mitigation in Tall Buildings Using the Tuned Mass-Damper-Inerter
Giaralis, A., & Petrini, F. (2017) · Journal of Structural Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001863 · Cited by 330
Dai, J., Xu, Z.-D., & Gai, P.-P. (2019) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109585 · Cited by 163
ROBUST VIBRATION CONTROL OF WIND-EXCITED HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURES
Wang, N., & Adeli, H. (2015) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/13923730.2015.1068843 · Cited by 52
Soleymani, M., & Khodadadi, M. (2014) · The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings · doi:10.1002/tal.1091 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J. N., Agrawal, A. K., Samali, B., & Wu, J.-C.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 437-446
- ISSN
- 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7889
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:4(437
- OpenAlex
- W2063980808
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benchmark Problem for Response Control of Wind-Excited Tall Buildings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:4(437
- The paper
- Yang, J. N., Agrawal, A. K., Samali, B., & Wu, J.-C. (2004). Benchmark Problem for Response Control of Wind-Excited Tall Buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130%3A4(437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.