The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design for Stream Restoration
Abstract
Stream restoration, or more properly rehabilitation, is the return of a degraded stream ecosystem to a close approximation of its remaining natural potential. Many types of practices (dam removal, levee breaching, modified flow control, vegetative methods for streambank erosion control, etc.) are useful, but this paper focuses on channel reconstruction. A tension exists between restoring natural fluvial processes and ensuring stability of the completed project. Sedimentation analyses are a key aspect of design since many projects fail due to erosion or sedimentation. Existing design approaches range from relatively simple ones based on stream classification and regional hydraulic geometry relations to more complex two- and three-dimensional numerical models. Herein an intermediate approach featuring application of hydraulic engineering tools for assessment of watershed geomorphology, channel-forming discharge analysis, and hydraulic analysis in the form of one-dimensional flow and sediment transport computations is described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many sites are inland waters such as Laguna Mar Chiquita, South America's largest lake, 175 a huge, permanent, saline lagoon up to 4 meters deep, edged by brackish that provide habitat for dozens of bird species.176”
From Protecting and restoring habitats to benefit freshwater biodiversity (2024) · cites this paper as [176]
Citations
Cited by
Ecological Restoration of Streams and Rivers: Shifting Strategies and Shifting Goals
Palmer, M. A., Hondula, K. L., & Koch, B. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935 · Cited by 475
A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters
Verdonschot, P. F. M., Spears, B. M., Feld, C. K., Brucet, S., Keizer-Vlek, H., Borja, A., Elliott, M., Kernan, M., & Johnson, R. K. (2013) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1294-7 · Cited by 165
Two-stage channel systems: Part 1, a practical approach for sizing agricultural ditches
Powell, G. E., Ward, A. D., Mecklenburg, D. E., & Jayakaran, A. D. (2007) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.2007.12435962 · Cited by 106
Protecting and restoring habitats to benefit freshwater biodiversity
Piczak, M. L., Perry, D., Cooke, S. J., Harrison, I., Benitez, S., Koning, A., Peng, L., Limbu, P., Smokorowski, K. E., Salinas-Rodriguez, S., et al. (2024) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/er-2023-0034 · Cited by 68
“Working with nature and nat-ural processes (e.g., fluvial geomorphology, sediment transport, and hydrology) is crucial to long-term success (Shields et al. 2003; Beechie et al. 2010).”
BackgroundJenkinson, R. G., Barnas, K. A., Braatne, J. H., Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., & Synthesis, T. N. R. R. S. (2006) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00119.x · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Shields, F. D., Copeland, R. R., Klingeman, P. C., Doyle, M. W., & Simon, A.
- Affiliations
- Research Hydraulic Engineer, USDA Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory, P. O. Box 1157, Oxford, MS 38655-1157.
- Consulting Hydraulic Engineer, Mobile Boundary Hydraulics, P. O. Box 264, Clinton, MS 39060.
- Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331-2302.
- Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3220.
- Research Geologist, USDA ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, P. O. Box 1157, Oxford, MS 38655-1157.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
- Published
- 2003
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design for Stream Restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2003)129:8(575
- The paper
- Shields, F. D., Copeland, R. R., Klingeman, P. C., Doyle, M. W., & Simon, A. (2003). Design for Stream Restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2003)129%3A8(575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
