Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Composite action in concrete filled tubes

Roeder, Charles W., Cameron, Brad, Brown, Colin B.·1999·Journal of Structural Engineering

Abstract

This paper studies composite action in concrete filled tubes (CFT) that have dimensions and proportions like those used in U.S. practice. CFT applications in buildings and the importance of bond stress and interface conditions to behavior are noted, past research is summarized, and the combined results are analyzed. An experimental study is described and evaluated. It is shown that shrinkage can be very detrimental to bond stress capacity, and the importance of shrinkage depends upon the characteristics of the concrete, the diameter of the tube, and the surface condition at the inside of the tube. The bond capacity is smaller with large diameter tubes and large d/t ratios. The bond capacity is interrelated with slip at the steel concrete interface. An exponential distribution of bond stress is expected prior to slip, and a more uniform distribution occurs after slip. An equation that estimates the bond stress capacity is developed, and this leads to design recommendations at different performance levels.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1999)125:5(477)

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Roeder, C. W., Cameron, B., & Brown, C. B.
Affiliations
Member, ASCE,
Venue
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
1999
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composite action in concrete filled tubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1999)125:5(477
The paper
Roeder, C. W., Cameron, B., & Brown, C. B. (1999). Composite action in concrete filled tubes. Journal of Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1999)125%3A5(477

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.