The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance Evaluation of Short-Term Time-Series Traffic Prediction Model
Open accessAbstract
One of the key functions of an effective Advanced Traveler and Management Information System is the ability to model short-term predictions of traffic conditions on major freeways and arterials with reasonable accuracy. The impetus of forecasting traffic information rather than relying on real-time information is to allow the traveling public to be proactive in their travel decisions at both pretrip planning stage and en route. Traffic information is usually reflected by the traditional performance measures such as travel times and delays. Such measures are well perceived by the traveling public and, hence, are adopted in most short-term traffic prediction studies. When disseminated to the traveling public, forecasted travel time information will help the travelers make better trip decisions in terms of departure time, route selection, and mode selection, when transit becomes competitive. Several traffic prediction models have been developed in the past using a wide spectrum of modeling techniques. Most studies showed that prediction accuracy is often compromised by the underlying mechanism of prediction methods more than other influencing factors. The main objective of this study is to investigate the factors that have a significant impact on the forecasting accuracy of travel times using a nonlinear time series traffic prediction model. The ultimate goal is to identify the operational settings and the anticipated forecasting accuracy of the model before it can be fully implemented. The study was conducted using extensive amount of real-time data collected from the 62.5 km corridor of Interstate-4 in Orlando, Florida. Various scenarios were generated from a combination of model parameter settings and different traffic conditions in order to test the performance of the model. Relative travel time prediction errors were used as a measure of performance and were based on speed predictions at freeway detector stations. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify the parameters with a statistically significant effect on the model's performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Djahel, S., Doolan, R., Muntean, G.-M., & Murphy, J. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2339817 · Cited by 440
Miglani, A., & Kumar, N. (2019) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100184 · Cited by 295
Wang, J., & Shi, Q. (2013) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2012.08.004 · Cited by 289
A predictive-control framework to address bus bunching
Andres, M., & Nair, R. (2017) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.013 · Cited by 95
Short-term traffic prediction using fuzzy C-means and cellular automata in a wide-area road network
Kanoh, H., Furukawa, T., Tsukahara, S., Hara, K., Nishi, H., & Kurokawa, H. (2005) · Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005. · doi:10.1109/itsc.2005.1520184 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishak, S., & Al-Deek, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Transportation Engineering
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 490-498
- ISSN
- 0733-947X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5436
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2002)128:6(490
- OpenAlex
- W1983025701
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Evaluation of Short-Term Time-Series Traffic Prediction Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2002)128:6(490
- The paper
- Ishak, S., & Al-Deek, H. (2002). Performance Evaluation of Short-Term Time-Series Traffic Prediction Model. Journal of Transportation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2002)128%3A6(490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.