Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash

Edil, Tuncer B., Acosta, Hector A., Benson, Craig H.·2006·Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
DOI 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:2(283

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of self-cementing fly ashes derived from combustion of sub-bituminous coal at electric power plants for stabilization of soft fine-grained soils. California bearing ratio (CBR) and resilient modulus (Mr) tests were conducted on mixtures prepared with seven soft fine-grained soils (six inorganic soils and one organic soil) and four fly ashes. The soils were selected to represent a relatively broad range of plasticity, with plasticity indices ranging between 15 and 38. Two of the fly ashes are high quality Class C ashes (per ASTM C 618) that are normally used in Portland cement concrete. The other ashes are off-specification ashes, meaning they do not meet the Class C or Class F criteria in ASTM C 618. Tests were conducted on soils and soil–fly ash mixtures prepared at optimum water content (a standardized condition), 7% wet of optimum water content (representative of the typical in situ condition in Wisconsin), and 9–18% wet of optimum water content (representative of a very wet in situ condition). Addition of fly ash resulted in appreciable increases in the CBR and Mr of the inorganic soils. For water contents 7% wet of optimum, CBRs of the soils alone ranged between 1 and 5. Addition of 10% fly ash resulted in CBRs ranging between 8 and 17 and 18% fly ash resulted in CBRs between 15 and 31. Similarly, Mr of the soil alone ranged between 3 and 15 MPa at 7% wet of optimum, whereas addition of 10% fly ash resulted in Mr between 12 and 60 MPa and 18% fly ash resulted in Mr between 51 and 106 MPa. In contrast, except for one fly ash, addition of fly ash generally had little effect on CBR or Mr of the organic soil.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:2(283)

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Edil, T. B., Acosta, H. A., & Benson, C. H.
Venue
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2006-04
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
283-294
ISSN
  • 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5533
DOI
10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:2(283
OpenAlex
W2131862275
Cited by
299
References
9
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:2(283
The paper
Edil, T. B., Acosta, H. A., & Benson, C. H. (2006). Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18%3A2(283

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.