The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes
Abstract
Design and construction industries, along with owners, have an increasing interest in and responsibility for the environmental impacts of buildings. Since the environmental impacts of a building’s life cycle are considerable, quantification of all phases is important, especially the construction phase, which is often glossed over. This research focuses on the construction phase of a building project. Generally, the life-cycle inventory created in performing a life-cycle assessment (LCA) is developed using either a process or input–output approach; however, both techniques have distinct advantages and disadvantages. A hybrid approach combining both methods’ advantages has been proposed and will be demonstrated. Existing hybrid models are reviewed, along with a recommendation of a hybrid model for construction. A preliminary case study of a precast concrete parking garage’s construction using hybrid LCA methodology is presented. Preliminary investigations indicate transportation, equipment activity, and support functions have the largest effects on the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 · Cited by 1,455
Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review
Petek Gursel, A., Masanet, E., Horvath, A., & Stadel, A. (2014) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005 · Cited by 451
Thiel, C. L., Eckelman, M., Guido, R., Huddleston, M., Landis, A. E., Sherman, J., Shrake, S. O., Copley-Woods, N., & Bilec, M. M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es504719g · Cited by 416
Self-citationQuale, J., Eckelman, M. J., Williams, K. W., Sloditskie, G., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2012) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00424.x · Cited by 220
Embodied energy of buildings: A review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends
Azari, R., & Abbasabadi, N. (2018) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.003 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilec, M., Ries, R., Matthews, H. S., & Sharrard, A. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Infrastructure Systems
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 207-215
- ISSN
- 1076-0342 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-555X
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2006)12:4(207
- OpenAlex
- W2033210477
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2006)12:4(207
- The paper
- Bilec, M., Ries, R., Matthews, H. S., & Sharrard, A. L. (2006). Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2006)12%3A4(207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.