The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When Disasters and Age Collide: Reviewing Vulnerability of the Elderly
Abstract
Natural disasters are a growing threat to human populations, particularly to vulnerable groups such as the elderly. A review of the literature on how the elderly respond in disasters indicates there are patterns of vulnerability in the social, psychological, and physiological dimensions. Research studies from sociology, psychology, and medicine, examining disaster loss and harm as it relates to age, form the basis for the differential vulnerability reviewed within this paper. Differential vulnerability between elderly and nonelderly disaster victims is summarized and discussed in the following areas: actual loss versus relative need, the perception of loss, service stigma and threats to independence, psychological vulnerability, and morbidity and mortality. Minimizing the disaster vulnerability of the elderly requires a solid understanding of the specific needs and traits of the elderly population, and identification of the risk factors that lead to their vulnerability. Effective disaster policies and programs will specifically target the elderly population, establish strong connections between the elderly and available resources, and evaluate the efforts to ensure that vulnerabilities are being modified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management
Flanagan, B. E., Gregory, E. W., Hallisey, E. J., Heitgerd, J. L., & Lewis, B. (2011) · Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management · doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1792 · Cited by 1,860
Rodríguez-Rey, R., Garrido-Hernansaiz, H., & Collado, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01540 · Cited by 683
Massey, E., Smith, J., & Roberts, B. (2017) · Conflict and Health · doi:10.1186/s13031-017-0133-x · Cited by 47
Potential Impacts of Extreme Heat and Bushfires on Dementia
Farugia, T. L., Cuni-Lopez, C., & White, A. R. (2021) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-201388 · Cited by 29
Understanding the Use of Crisis Informatics Technology among Older Adults
Zhang, Y., Suhaimi, N., Azghandi, R., Joseph, M. A., Kim, M., Griffin, J., & Parker, A. G. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376862 · Cited by 23
Wood, N., & Soulard, C. (2008) · Scientific Investigations Report · doi:10.3133/sir20085004 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ngo, E. B.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards Review
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-89
- ISSN
- 1527-6988 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6996
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2001)2:2(80
- OpenAlex
- W2031830079
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.