Cited by 23Technology Use by Older AdultsDisaster Management and ResiliencePublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Understanding the Use of Crisis Informatics Technology among Older Adults

Open access
Zhang, Yixuan, Suhaimi, Nurul, Azghandi, Rana, Joseph, Mary Amulya, Kim, Miso, Griffin, Jacqueline, Parker, Andrea G.·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Mass emergencies increasingly pose significant threats to human life, with a disproportionate burden being incurred by older adults. Research has explored how mobile technology can mitigate the effects of mass emergencies. However, less work has examined how mobile technologies support older adults during emergencies, considering their unique needs. To address this research gap, we interviewed 16 older adults who had recent experience with an emergency evacuation to understand the perceived value of using mobile technology during emergencies. We found that there was a lack of awareness and engagement with existing crisis apps. Our findings characterize the ways in which our participants did and did not feel crisis informatics tools address human values, including basic needs and esteem needs. We contribute an understanding of how older adults used mobile technology during emergencies and their perspectives on how well such tools address human values.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3313831.3376862

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Excluding marginalized groups from study samples is fundamentally unethical and can lead to biased findings and systems with embedded bias.

    “Excluding these groups from study samples is fundamentally unethical and can lead to biased fndings and, subsequently, the development of systems with embedded bias [117].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4][4] Claudia K Allen, Sarah L Austin, Sandra K David, O MHE, Deane B McCraith, and Linda Riska-Williams. 2007. Manual for the Allen cognitive level screen-5 (ACLS-5) and Large Allen cognitive level screen-5 (LACLS-5). J. Occup. Therapy 56 (2007), 609-639. -
  2. [31][31] Amanda Howard, Kylie Agllias, Miriam Bevis, and Tamara Blakemore. 2017. 'They'll tell us when to evacuate': The experiences and expectations of disaster-related communication in vulnerable groups. International journal of disaster risk reduction 22 (2017), 139-146. -
  3. [36][36] Bran Knowles and Vicki L Hanson. 2018. Older Adultsâ ˘ A ´ Z Deployment of â ˘ AŸDistrustâ ˘ A ´ Z. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 4 (2018), 21. -
  4. [70][70] Robyn Tuohy, Christine Stephens, and David Johnston. 2014. Older adults' disaster preparedness in the context of the September 2010-December 2012 Canterbury earthquake sequence. International journal of disaster risk reduction 9 (2014), 194-203. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Suhaimi, N., Azghandi, R., Joseph, M. A., Kim, M., Griffin, J., & Parker, A. G.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-21
Pages
1-13
OpenAlex
W2999817214
Cited by
23
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Northeastern University's TIER 1
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
crisis informatics, older adults, mobile technology, emergency evacuation, mass emergencies, human values, basic needs, esteem needs, technology adoption, disaster preparedness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review