Cited by 42Planetary Science and ExplorationSpace Exploration and TechnologySpacecraft Design and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ROxygen Project: Outpost-Scale Lunar Oxygen Production System Development at Johnson Space Center

Abstract

In 2009; the Augustine report reinforced the importance of in situ oxygen production as a critical technology for sustainable exploration. Engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Johnson Space Center have been working on making this critical technology a reality through the design, fabrication, and testing of two hydrogen reduction reactors, accomplished as part of the ROxygen project. Engineers built and extensively tested a small-scale reactor that provided key design parametrics for the second reactor—a large-scale vessel consistent with the scale required to produce 1,000 kg (2,205 lb) of oxygen per year. Once designed and fabricated, this large-scale reactor was tested in the laboratory and in the 2008 in situ research utilization field test on the slopes of Mauna Kea, Hawaii, and in the laboratory at Johnson Space Center. This paper presents an overview of the approach taken, the high-level design information required, and the typical test data accrued for both the small-scale and large-scale reactors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000230

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Augustine N. R. (2009). Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee: Seeking a human spaceflight program worthy of a great nation National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington DC.
  2. Ride S., 1987, Leadership and America's future in space: A report to the administrator
  3. Stafford T. P., 1990, America at the threshold: America's space exploration initiative

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Lee, K. A., Oryshchyn, L., Paz, A., Reddington, M., & Simon, T. M.
Affiliations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Kristopher A.
Venue
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Published
2013-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
67-73
ISSN
  • 0893-1321 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5525
OpenAlex
W2112429753
Cited by
42
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Aerospace Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
lunar oxygen production, in-situ resource utilization, nuclear reactor testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review