Cited by 14Planetary Science and ExplorationSpacecraft Design and TechnologySpace Exploration and Technology

Lunar Production System for Extracting Oxygen from Regolith

Linne, Diane L., Schuler, Jason M., Sibille, Laurent, Kleinhenz, Julie E., Colozza, Anthony J., J. Fincannon, Homer, Oleson, Steven R., Suzuki, Nantel H. +1 more·2021·Journal of Aerospace Engineering

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the mass and power of an in situ propellant production plant producing 10.5 t of liquid oxygen per year from the regolith at the lunar south pole. The carbothermal reduction process was selected for oxygen extraction from the regolith, using direct solar energy from a concentrator for the thermal heating in the carbothermal reactor, and solar arrays for the remaining electrical power needs. The baseline lander design selected for delivery of the production plant is capable of landing a payload mass of 3,600 kg and has significant cargo area available below the propulsion deck close to the ground for the in situ resource utilization (ISRU) hardware. Total mass for the 10.5-t oxygen plant, including all power systems, structure, command and control, communication, thermal management, and 30% margin, was 4,145 kg, exceeding the lander’s payload capability. A second design of a smaller plant producing 7 t of oxygen per year resulted in a mass of 3,459 kg, which is within the lander’s capability. Mass payback ratio for the 10.5- and 7-t oxygen plants is 0.4 and 0.5 (kg hardware)/(kg oxygen/yr), respectively, and indicates that a net gain of mass on the lunar surface can be realized in three to four months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001269

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CTR uses carbon to reduce lunar regolith at theoretically viable temperatures near 850°C for certain oxides, though practical operation typically requires temperatures above 1500°C.

    “CTR uses carbon to reduce lunar regolith at theoretically viable temperatures near 850 • C for certain oxides, though practical operation typically requires temperatures above 1500 • C.”
  • CTR currently targets iron and silicon extraction and produces carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide as byproducts, but requires an external carbon source typically in the form of methane or graphite.

    “The process currently targets iron and silicon extraction and produces carbon monoxide and/ or carbon dioxide as byproducts, but it requires an external carbon source typically in the form of methane or graphite.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linne, D. L., Schuler, J. M., Sibille, L., Kleinhenz, J. E., Colozza, A. J., J. Fincannon, H., Oleson, S. R., Suzuki, N. H., & Moore, L.
Affiliations
  • Glenn Research Center (US)
  • Kennedy Space Center (US)
  • NASA Glenn Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Rd., Cleveland, OH 44135.
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
Corresponding author
Linne, Diane L.
Venue
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Published
2021-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0893-1321 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5525
OpenAlex
W3159431993
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Aerospace Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
lunar oxygen production, carbothermal reduction, in-situ resource utilization, lunar south pole, solar arrays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review