Cited by 19Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

Removal of metal ions from storm-water runoff by low-cost sorbents: batch and column studies

Vijayaraghavan, K., Joshi, Umid Man, Balasubramanian, R.·2010·Journal of Environmental Engineering

Abstract

The possibility of using the sorption technology to reduce the levels of metal ions present in urban storm-water runoff was investigated in this study. Seven sorbent materials including Amberlite XAD7, chitosan, crab shell, peat, Sargassum, sawdust, and sugarcane bagasse were initially examined for removal of 11 metal ions (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb) from simulated storm-water runoff at different concentrations. Among these sorbents, crab shell performed well with removal efficiencies exceeding 93% for all heavy metal ions examined and thus selected for further studies. Based on scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, microprecipitation of metal carbonates followed by adsorption onto the surface of crab shell was identified as the major mechanism responsible for removal of heavy metal ions by crab shell. Crab shell exhibited rapid removal of meal ions with attainment of biosorption equilibrium within 20 min. A crab-shell-packed column was used to study the continuous metal retention process. The column performed very well in the removal of heavy metal ions and was able to operate up to 192 h at a flow rate of 10 mL/min before outlet concentrations of Mn and Co reached 0.3 times of their respective inlet concentrations. Other metal ions such as Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, and Cu were only in trace levels in the final effluent until 192 h. These findings would form the basis for the future development of crab-shell-based biofilters for removal of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000238

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vijayaraghavan, K., Joshi, U. M., & Balasubramanian, R.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Postdoctoral Fellow, Singapore-Delft Water Alliance, National Univ. of Singapore, 2 Engineering Dr. 2, Singapore 117577, Singapore.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Published
2010-10
Volume
136
Issue
10
Pages
1113-1118
ISSN
  • 0733-9372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7870
OpenAlex
W2094665519
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
stormwater runoff, heavy metal removal, biosorption, crab shell, low-cost adsorbent, metal carbonates, microprecipitation, column adsorption, biofilter, urban stormwater treatment, lead, cadmium, manganese, cobalt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review