Removal of metal ions from storm-water runoff by low-cost sorbents: batch and column studies
Abstract
The possibility of using the sorption technology to reduce the levels of metal ions present in urban storm-water runoff was investigated in this study. Seven sorbent materials including Amberlite XAD7, chitosan, crab shell, peat, Sargassum, sawdust, and sugarcane bagasse were initially examined for removal of 11 metal ions (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb) from simulated storm-water runoff at different concentrations. Among these sorbents, crab shell performed well with removal efficiencies exceeding 93% for all heavy metal ions examined and thus selected for further studies. Based on scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, microprecipitation of metal carbonates followed by adsorption onto the surface of crab shell was identified as the major mechanism responsible for removal of heavy metal ions by crab shell. Crab shell exhibited rapid removal of meal ions with attainment of biosorption equilibrium within 20 min. A crab-shell-packed column was used to study the continuous metal retention process. The column performed very well in the removal of heavy metal ions and was able to operate up to 192 h at a flow rate of 10 mL/min before outlet concentrations of Mn and Co reached 0.3 times of their respective inlet concentrations. Other metal ions such as Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, and Cu were only in trace levels in the final effluent until 192 h. These findings would form the basis for the future development of crab-shell-based biofilters for removal of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies concerning filter material in stormwater bioretention test alternative low-cost materials or adsorbents.
“or III) Test alternative low-cost materials or adsorbents (e.g. red soil, perlite, vermiculite, coco-peat, construction waste etc.) (e.g. Vijayaraghavan et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Vijayaraghavan et al., 2010
Cites
Genç-Fuhrman, H., Mikkelsen, P. S., & Ledin, A. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.10.024 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Søberg, L. C., Winston, R., Viklander, M., & Blecken, G.-T. (2019) · Water Research X · doi:10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100032 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vijayaraghavan, K., Joshi, U. M., & Balasubramanian, R.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Postdoctoral Fellow, Singapore-Delft Water Alliance, National Univ. of Singapore, 2 Engineering Dr. 2, Singapore 117577, Singapore.
- ORCID
- Vijayaraghavan, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Engineering
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1113-1118
- ISSN
- 0733-9372 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7870
- OpenAlex
- W2094665519
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Engineering (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
- Keywords
- stormwater runoff, heavy metal removal, biosorption, crab shell, low-cost adsorbent, metal carbonates, microprecipitation, column adsorption, biofilter, urban stormwater treatment, lead, cadmium, manganese, cobalt
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review