Cited by 295Infrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Data analytics in asset management: Cost-effective prediction of the pavement condition index

Piryonesi, S. Madeh, El-Diraby, Tamer E.·2020·Journal of Infrastructure Systems

Abstract

Understanding the deterioration of roads is an important part of road asset management. In this study, the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) data and machine learning algorithms were used to predict the deterioration in the pavement condition index (PCI) over 2, 3, 5, and 6 years. In selecting the attributes for conducting the analysis, we targeted ones that are freely available. This approach can help smaller municipalities, which could be short on money or required expertise. For larger ones and transportation agencies, this can save the increasingly significant costs for collecting field data and any associated safety or traffic implications. In addition, we used this category of attributes to better examine the role of data analytics in asset management. Without considering a causal model, can trends in data help assess deterioration in the PCI? Several models using combinations of 15 attributes were learned and tested. The algorithms used in this study were two types of decision trees and their boosted models based on gradient boosted trees. The accuracy of the ensemble of boosted classifiers was considerably higher than their base learners, with some reaching over 80% in predicting unseen data. We also found that dividing data into different climatic zones can change the relative importance of attributes and the overall accuracy of the models. Increasing the prediction span reduces accuracy, while reducing the number of prediction classes (levels of deterioration) increases the accuracy. In addition to automating the calculation and prediction of PCI, this study presented informative or important attributes for prediction. Such analyses could help municipalities and departments of transportations with forming a more effective policy for data collection and management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000512

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piryonesi, S. M., & El-Diraby, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Piryonesi, S. Madeh
Venue
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Published
2020-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1076-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-555X
OpenAlex
W2996338922
Cited by
295
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Infrastructure Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
pavement condition index, pavement deterioration prediction, road asset management, decision tree, gradient boosting decision tree, climate zones, attribute importance, municipal road maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review