Cited by 131Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisDisaster Management and ResiliencePower System Reliability and Maintenance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fragility Curves for Assessing the Resilience of Electricity Networks Constructed from an Extensive Fault Database

Open access
Dunn, Sarah, Wilkinson, Sean, Alderson, David, Fowler, Hayley, Galasso, Carmine·2018·Natural Hazards Review

Abstract

Robust infrastructure networks are vital to ensure community resilience; their failure leads to severe societal disruption and they have important postdisaster functions. However, as these networks consist of interconnected, but geographically-distributed, components, system resilience is difficult to assess. In this paper the authors propose the use of an extension to the catastrophe (CAT) risk modeling approach, which is primarily used to perform risk assessments of independent assets, to be adopted for these interdependent systems. To help to achieve this, fragility curves, a crucial element of CAT models, are developed for overhead electrical lines using an empirical approach to ascribe likely failures due to wind storm hazard. To generate empirical fragility curves for electrical overhead lines, a dataset of over 12,000 electrical failures is coupled to a European reanalysis (ERA) wind storm model, ERA-Interim. The authors consider how the spatial resolution of the electrical fault data affects these curves, generating a fragility curve with low resolution fault data with a R2 value of 0.9271 and improving this to a R2 value of 0.9889 using higher spatial resolution data. Recommendations for deriving similar fragility curves for other infrastructure systems and/or hazards using the same methodological approach are also made. The authors argue that the developed fragility curves are applicable to other regions with similar electrical infrastructure and wind speeds, although some additional calibration may be required.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000267

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857942 · DOI
  2. Basoz N. and Kiremidjian A. S. (1997). “Risk assessment of bridges and highway systems from the Northridge earthquake.” 2nd National Seismic Conf. on Bridges and Highways Transportation Research Board Washington DC.
  3. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000108 · DOI
  4. 10.5194/nhess-12-1769-2012 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00382-013-1742-8 · DOI
  6. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(186) · DOI
  7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(36) · DOI
  8. 10.1002/qj.828 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921) · DOI
  10. Fowler H. J., 2007, Estimating change in extreme European precipitation using a multimodel ensemble, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112, 2156
  11. 10.1007/b100669 · DOI
  12. HAZUS (Hazard U.S.), 2015, Hazus—MH 2.1, earthquake model, technical manual
  13. HAZUS (Hazard U.S.), 2015, Hazus—MH 2.1, flood model, technical manual
  14. HAZUS (Hazard U.S.), 2015, Hazus—MH 2.1, hurricane model, technical manual
  15. Jacob D., 2013, Regional environmental change, 1
  16. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.026 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1983.tb00118.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0029-5493(80)90203-4 · DOI
  19. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(45) · DOI
  20. 10.5194/nhess-3-725-2003 · DOI
  21. 10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014 · DOI
  22. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:1(37) · DOI
  23. 10.1142/S0219455408002740 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-3-540-68056-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001 · DOI
  26. 10.1193/1.2720892 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017396 · DOI
  28. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000012 · DOI
  29. Risk Management Solutions, 2008, The review: A guide to catastrophe modelling
  30. 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.019 · DOI
  31. Salman A. M., 2016, Assessing climate change impact on system reliability of power distribution systems subjected to hurricanes, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 04016024
  32. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(60) · DOI
  33. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(40) · DOI
  34. 10.21236/ADA525580 · DOI
  35. Sforna M. and Delfanti M. (2006). “Overview of the events and causes of the 2003 Italian blackout.” Proc. 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition IEEE New York 301–308. · DOI
  36. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(922) · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s11069-013-0895-4 · DOI
  38. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(82) · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s11069-012-0164-y · DOI
  40. Wilkinson S. M., 2014, ECLISE deliverable 4.07 of task T4.5: Estimates of extreme wind speed used for the design of buildings
  41. 10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 131

Metadata

Authors
Dunn, S., Wilkinson, S., Alderson, D., Fowler, H., & Galasso, C.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Sarah
Venue
Natural Hazards Review
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1527-6988 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6996
OpenAlex
W2758133498
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Natural Hazards Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I035781/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/N012992/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Keywords
fragility curves, interdependent infrastructure systems, overhead electrical lines, fault database, ERA-Interim reanalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review