The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fragility Curves for Assessing the Resilience of Electricity Networks Constructed from an Extensive Fault Database
Open accessAbstract
Robust infrastructure networks are vital to ensure community resilience; their failure leads to severe societal disruption and they have important postdisaster functions. However, as these networks consist of interconnected, but geographically-distributed, components, system resilience is difficult to assess. In this paper the authors propose the use of an extension to the catastrophe (CAT) risk modeling approach, which is primarily used to perform risk assessments of independent assets, to be adopted for these interdependent systems. To help to achieve this, fragility curves, a crucial element of CAT models, are developed for overhead electrical lines using an empirical approach to ascribe likely failures due to wind storm hazard. To generate empirical fragility curves for electrical overhead lines, a dataset of over 12,000 electrical failures is coupled to a European reanalysis (ERA) wind storm model, ERA-Interim. The authors consider how the spatial resolution of the electrical fault data affects these curves, generating a fragility curve with low resolution fault data with a R2 value of 0.9271 and improving this to a R2 value of 0.9889 using higher spatial resolution data. Recommendations for deriving similar fragility curves for other infrastructure systems and/or hazards using the same methodological approach are also made. The authors argue that the developed fragility curves are applicable to other regions with similar electrical infrastructure and wind speeds, although some additional calibration may be required.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, in absence of cascading failures, the magnitude of a power system's performance drop during a windstorm is largely determined by the fragility of the powerline poles as a function of the wind strength [20,68,69].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
In the citing paper
“Fragility curves were originally developed for modeling building failures during earthquakes, but are increasingly used for power grid component failures during windstorms [68,69,76,77].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857942 · DOI
- Basoz N. and Kiremidjian A. S. (1997). “Risk assessment of bridges and highway systems from the Northridge earthquake.” 2nd National Seismic Conf. on Bridges and Highways Transportation Research Board Washington DC.
- 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000108 · DOI
- 10.5194/nhess-12-1769-2012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-013-1742-8 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(186) · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(36) · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921) · DOI
- Fowler H. J., 2007, Estimating change in extreme European precipitation using a multimodel ensemble, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112, 2156
- 10.1007/b100669 · DOI
- HAZUS (Hazard U.S.), 2015, Hazus—MH 2.1, earthquake model, technical manual
- HAZUS (Hazard U.S.), 2015, Hazus—MH 2.1, flood model, technical manual
- HAZUS (Hazard U.S.), 2015, Hazus—MH 2.1, hurricane model, technical manual
- Jacob D., 2013, Regional environmental change, 1
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.026 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1983.tb00118.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0029-5493(80)90203-4 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(45) · DOI
- 10.5194/nhess-3-725-2003 · DOI
- 10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:1(37) · DOI
- 10.1142/S0219455408002740 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-68056-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1193/1.2720892 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017396 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000012 · DOI
- Risk Management Solutions, 2008, The review: A guide to catastrophe modelling
- 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.019 · DOI
- Salman A. M., 2016, Assessing climate change impact on system reliability of power distribution systems subjected to hurricanes, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 04016024
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(60) · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(40) · DOI
- 10.21236/ADA525580 · DOI
- Sforna M. and Delfanti M. (2006). “Overview of the events and causes of the 2003 Italian blackout.” Proc. 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition IEEE New York 301–308. · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(922) · DOI
- 10.1007/s11069-013-0895-4 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(82) · DOI
- 10.1007/s11069-012-0164-y · DOI
- Wilkinson S. M., 2014, ECLISE deliverable 4.07 of task T4.5: Estimates of extreme wind speed used for the design of buildings
- 10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy system resilience – A review
Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476 · Cited by 412
“powerline poles as a function of the wind strength [20,68,69].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, S., Wilkinson, S., Alderson, D., Fowler, H., & Galasso, C.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dunn, Sarah
- Venue
- Natural Hazards Review
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1527-6988 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6996
- OpenAlex
- W2758133498
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Natural Hazards Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I035781/1)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/N012992/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
- Keywords
- fragility curves, interdependent infrastructure systems, overhead electrical lines, fault database, ERA-Interim reanalysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review