The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of the Escalation Factor in Construction Projects Using Value at Risk
Abstract
Cost overrun in construction projects is a critical challenge for both owners and contractors. Budgeting for cost escalation is a major concern in the planning stage of these projects. This study aims to introduce a systematic approach to model the cost escalation factors in the construction projects. First, it is proposed to use the ENR construction cost index (CCI) as a measure of the construction cost escalation. Then, using GARCH family models, variance or so-called volatility of the escalation factor was calculated. Finally, having the estimation of the volatility of the escalation factor, and using the Value at Risk (VaR) technique, we calculate the VaR of the escalation factor. VaR, in its most general form measures the potential decrease or increase in value of a risky asset or a price index over a defined period for a given confidence interval. This calculation assures cost estimators that the actual value of the escalation factor will not exceed more than the calculated one within a reasonable bound. Planners and cost estimators can use this systematic approach for budgeting and calculating the escalation factor and risk premiums in a more conservative way.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In financial terms, it is traditional to choose a P95 percentile as risk appetite.
“In financial terms, it is traditional to choose a P95 percentile as risk appetite (Chen and Peng, 2018;Joukar and Nahmens, 2016;Gatti et al. 2007;Kuester et al. 2006;Giot and Laurent, 2003).”
From Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: A quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation (2024) · cites this paper as Joukar and Nahmens, 2016
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acebes, F., González-Varona, J. M., López-Paredes, A., & Pajares, J. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03180-5 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Joukar, A., & Nahmens, I.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- ORCID
- Nahmens, Isabelina
- Venue
- Construction Research Congress 2016
- Publisher
- American Society of Civil Engineers
- Published
- 2016-05-24
- Pages
- 2351-2359
- OpenAlex
- W2405830393
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Value Engineering and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
- Keywords
- cost escalation, construction cost overruns, value at risk, GARCH models, cost estimation, risk budgeting, risk premium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review