The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis
Open accessAbstract
The storm water management model (SWMM) is a widely used tool for urban drainage design and planning. Hundreds of peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings have been written describing applications of SWMM. This review focuses on collecting information on model performance with respect to calibration and validation in the peer-reviewed literature. The major developmental history and applications of the model are also presented. The results provide utility to others looking for a quick reference to gauge the integrity of their own unique SWMM application. A gap analysis assesses the model's ability to perform water-quality simulations considering green infrastructure (GI)/low impact development (LID) designs and effectiveness. It is concluded that the level of detail underlying the conceptual model of SWMM versus its overall computational parsimony is well balanced-making it an adequate model for large and medium-scale hydrologic applications. However, embedding a new mechanistic algorithm or providing user guidance for coupling with other models will be necessary to realistically simulate diffuse pollutant sources, their fate and transport, and the effectiveness of GI/LID implementation scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Change and the Ecology of Cities
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150195 · Cited by 7,139
Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation
Legates, D. R., & McCabe, G. J. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900018 · Cited by 4,591
Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature
Hargreaves, G. H., & Samani, Z. A. (1985) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/2013.26773 · Cited by 4,574
The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction
Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305 · Cited by 4,527
Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment
Krause, P., Boyle, D. P., & Bäse, F. (2005) · Advances in Geosciences · doi:10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005 · Cited by 2,809
Heber Green, W., & Ampt, G. A. (1911) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600001441 · Cited by 2,449
Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. K. (1994) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4 · Cited by 1,508
Dietz, M. E. (2007) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z · Cited by 1,088
Modeling infiltration during a steady rain
Mein, R. G., & Larson, C. L. (1973) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr009i002p00384 · Cited by 1,019
Pataki, D. E., Carreiro, M. M., Cherrier, J., Grulke, N. E., Jennings, V., Pincetl, S., Pouyat, R. V., Whitlow, T. H., & Zipperer, W. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/090220 · Cited by 860
Metadata
- Authors
- Niazi, M., Nietch, C., Maghrebi, M., Jackson, N., Bennett, B. R., Tryby, M., & Massoudieh, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2379-6111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2583056202
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/jswbay.0000817
- The paper
- Niazi, M., Nietch, C., Maghrebi, M., Jackson, N., Bennett, B. R., Tryby, M., & Massoudieh, A. (2017). Storm Water Management Model: Performance Review and Gap Analysis. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1061/jswbay.0000817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.