Green Infrastructure Retrofits with Impervious Area Reduction by Property Type: Potential Improvements to Urban Stream Quality
Abstract
Building on concepts that relate stream health to extent of watershed impervious area and the capability of green infrastructure (GI) measures that remove runoff volume to reduce effective impervious area, the extent of GI retrofits possible in existing urban watersheds with stormwater-induced impairments was investigated with impervious area reduction as the key metric. Potential reduction in directly connected impervious area (DCIA) via GI retrofits was estimated for two watersheds in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; one is dominated by commercial and the other by single-family residential development. The extent of possible DCIA reduction and the differences in contribution by property and ownership type were examined relative to potential stream quality improvement goals. The results indicate that GI retrofits are needed on all property types to significantly impact aggregate DCIA reduction. Private commercial property plays a significant role, providing up to 45% and 35% of total DCIA reduction potential in the commercial and single-family watersheds, respectively. Public property also has great potential, contributing nearly 35% of total DCIA reduction in both watersheds, with the majority attributed to roadway retrofits. Single-family property contributes the remaining 20%–30% in the respective watersheds. The percentage of DCIA remaining in each watershed under a range of retrofit scenarios is not promising relative to a target stream health threshold of 10% imperv…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Small-scale projects may be the better alternatives to large projects that must overcome limited space and uncooperative landowners, particularly in areas with no opportunity to retrofit pre-existing stormwater management structures.
“Small-scale projects may be the better alternatives to large projects that must overcome limited space and uncooperative landowners (Backhaus et al. 2012;Malinowski et al. 2018;Woznicki et al. 2018), particularly in areas with no opportunity to retrofit pre-existing stormwater management structures.”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Malinowski et al. 2018
Support for small municipalities must combine technical expertise and education and outreach to address complex systems affecting green infrastructure integration.
“Support must combine technical expertise and education and outreach to address complex systems such as how site suitability (physical characteristics, parcel ownership, etc.), location within a watershed, connectivity to other BMPs and existing green spaces all affect the logistics and cost-effectiveness of green infrastructure integration (Malinowski et al. 2018).”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Malinowski et al. 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities
Rieck, L., Carson, C., Hawley, R. J., Heller, M., Paul, M., Scoggins, M., Zimmerman, M., & Smith, R. F. (2022) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-021-01179-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Malinowski, P. A., Wu, J. S., Pulugurtha, S., & Stillwell, A. S.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Malinowski, Patricia A.
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2379-6111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888072151
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Keywords
- stormwater runoff, commercial property, public property, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review