The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Langevin stabilization of molecular dynamics
Abstract
In this paper we show the possibility of using very mild stochastic damping to stabilize long time step integrators for Newtonian molecular dynamics. More specifically, stable and accurate integrations are obtained for damping coefficients that are only a few percent of the natural decay rate of processes of interest, such as the velocity autocorrelation function. Two new multiple time stepping integrators, Langevin Molly (LM) and Brünger–Brooks–Karplus–Molly (BBK–M), are introduced in this paper. Both use the mollified impulse method for the Newtonian term. LM uses a discretization of the Langevin equation that is exact for the constant force, and BBK–M uses the popular Brünger–Brooks–Karplus integrator (BBK). These integrators, along with an extrapolative method called LN, are evaluated across a wide range of damping coefficient values. When large damping coefficients are used, as one would for the implicit modeling of solvent molecules, the method LN is superior, with LM closely following. However, with mild damping of 0.2 ps−1, LM produces the best results, allowing long time steps of 14 fs in simulations containing explicitly modeled flexible water. With BBK–M and the same damping coefficient, time steps of 12 fs are possible for the same system. Similar results are obtained for a solvated protein–DNA simulation of estrogen receptor ER with estrogen response element ERE. A parallel version of BBK–M runs nearly three times faster than the Verlet-I/r-RESPA (reversible reference system propagator algorithm) when using the largest stable time step on each one, and it also parallelizes well. The computation of diffusion coefficients for flexible water and ER/ERE shows that when mild damping of up to 0.2 ps−1 is used the dynamics are not significantly distorted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W., & Klein, M. L. (1983) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.445869 · Cited by 41,298
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins
MacKerell, A. D., Bashford, D., Bellott, M., Dunbrack, R. L., Evanseck, J. D., Field, M. J., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H., Ha, S., et al. (1998) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp973084f · Cited by 14,311
Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations
(2016) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-45-rc1 · Cited by 5,002
Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics
Tuckerman, M., Berne, B. J., & Martyna, G. J. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.463137 · Cited by 3,592
NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics
Kalé, L., Skeel, R., Bhandarkar, M., Brunner, R., Gursoy, A., Krawetz, N., Phillips, J., Shinozaki, A., Varadarajan, K., & Schulten, K. (1999) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6201 · Cited by 2,428
Self-citationMolecular Modelling: Principles and Applications
Leach, A. R. (1996) · Cited by 1,945
Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor
Kumar, V., Green, S., Stack, G., Berry, M., Jin, J.-R., & Chambon, P. (1987) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90581-2 · Cited by 1,316
An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms
Pastor, R. W., Brooks, B. R., & Szabo, A. (1988) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268978800101881 · Cited by 1,043
An all-atom empirical energy function for the simulation of nucleic acids
MacKerell, A. D., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J., & Karplus, M. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00153a017 · Cited by 708
Cited by
Coarse grain models and the computer simulation of soft materials
Nielsen, S. O., Lopez, C. F., Srinivas, G., & Klein, M. L. (2004) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/15/r03 · Cited by 423
Discovery Through the Computational Microscope
Lee, E. H., Hsin, J., Sotomayor, M., Comellas, G., & Schulten, K. (2009) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2009.09.001 · Cited by 334
Robichaux, J. P., Elamin, Y. Y., Vijayan, R. S. K., Nilsson, M. B., Hu, L., He, J., Zhang, F., Pisegna, M., Poteete, A., Sun, H., et al. (2019) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2019.09.001 · Cited by 242
Kong, R., Liu, T., Zhu, X., Ahmad, S., Williams, A. L., Phan, A. T., Zhao, H., Scott, J. E., Yeh, L.-A., & Wong, S. T. C. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0395 · Cited by 90
Computational Alanine Scanning Mutagenesis: MM-PBSA vs TI
Martins, S. A., Perez, M. A. S., Moreira, I. S., Sousa, S. F., Ramos, M. J., & Fernandes, P. A. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct4000372 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Izaguirre, J. A., Catarello, D. P., Wozniak, J. M., & Skeel, R. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2090-2098
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2043666236
- Cited by
- 1,077
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Langevin stabilization of molecular dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1332996
- The paper
- Izaguirre, J. A., Catarello, D. P., Wozniak, J. M., & Skeel, R. D. (2001). Langevin stabilization of molecular dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1332996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.