Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 707

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new parametrization of exchange–correlation generalized gradient approximation functionals

Boese, A. Daniel, Handy, Nicholas C.·2001·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

A new “HCTH” generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional is presented. Its 15 parameters have been refined against data from a training set containing 407 atomic and molecular systems. We believe that the much enhanced training set means that the new functional HCTH/407 has a much greater universality than previous GGA functionals. Statistical data is presented for the 407 set for the new functional, as well as other functionals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1347371

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Boese, A. D., & Handy, N. C.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
114
Issue
13
Pages
5497-5503
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1980625065
Cited by
707
References
0
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.