The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Description of the parallel thermal conductance technique for the measurement of the thermal conductivity of small diameter samples
Abstract
In order to measure the thermal conductivity of small needlelike samples (2.0×0.05×0.1 mm3) such as pentatellurides and single carbon fibers, we have developed a new technique called the parallel thermal conductance (PTC) technique. In the more typical steady state method that is used for measuring thermal conductivity, thermocouples are attached to the sample in order to measure the temperature gradient and a heater in order to supply this gradient. However, attaching thermocouples and heaters directly to small samples may be relatively difficult, and cause large heat losses and errors. Thus, the measurement of the thermal conductivity of small samples and thin films has been a formidable challenge, with only few successes, due, among other factors, to the heat loss. It is also difficult for the small samples to support the heaters and thermocouples without causing damage to the sample. In this paper we describe the recently developed PTC method providing measurements on standards as well as single carbon fibers, in addition to preliminary pentatelluride crystals measurements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The parallel thermal conductance technique was introduced by Tritt et al for small needle-like samples.
“The parallel thermal conductance technique was introduced by Tritt et al [36] for small needle-like samples (e.g.2.0 × 0.05 × 0.1 mm 3 [36], 10 × 1 × 1 mm 3 [37]).”
From Measurement Techniques for Thermal Conductivity and Interfacial Thermal Conductance of Bulk and Thin Film Materials (2016) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
Thermal conductivity measurement from 30 to 750 K: the 3ω method
Cahill, D. G. (1990) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1141498 · Cited by 1,928
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 1999, Phys. Rev. B, 60, 13453, 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.13453 · DOI
- 1981, Cryogenics, 21, 118, 10.1016/0011-2275(81)90062-X · DOI
- 1975, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 46, 439, 10.1063/1.1134235 · DOI
- 1987, Measurement, 5, 2, 10.1016/0263-2241(87)90020-0 · DOI
- 1999, Phys. Rev. B, 59, R9015, 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R9015 · DOI
- 1998, Appl. Phys. Lett., 72, 2056, 10.1063/1.121406 · DOI
- 1997, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 68, 2494, 10.1063/1.1148147 · DOI
- 1985, J. Phys. D, 18, 1307, 10.1088/0022-3727/18/7/016 · DOI
- 2000, Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 2319, 10.1063/1.1316065 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhao, D., Qian, X., Gu, X., Jajja, S. A., & Yang, R. (2016) · Journal of Electronic Packaging · doi:10.1115/1.4034605 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Zawilski, B. M., Littleton, R. T., & Tritt, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1770-1774
- ISSN
- 0034-6748
- 1089-7623
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review