Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond Navier–Stokes: Burnett equations for flows in the continuum–transition regime

Agarwal, Ramesh K., Yun, Keon-Young, Balakrishnan, Ramesh·2001·Physics of Fluids

Abstract

In hypersonic flows about space vehicles in low earth orbits or flows in microchannels of microelectromechanical devices, the local Knudsen number lies in the continuum–transition regime. Navier–Stokes equations are not adequate to model these flows since they are based on small deviation from local thermodynamic equilibrium. To model these flows, a number of extended hydrodynamics or generalized hydrodynamics models have been proposed over the past fifty years, along with the direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) approach. One of these models is the Burnett equations which are obtained from the Chapman–Enskog expansion of the Boltzmann equation [with Knudsen number (Kn) as a small parameter] to O(Kn2). With the currently available computing power, it has been possible in recent years to numerically solve the Burnett equations. However, attempts at solving the Burnett equations have uncovered many physical and numerical difficulties with the Burnett model. As a result, several improvements to the conventional Burnett equations have been proposed in recent years to address both the physical and numerical issues; two of the most well known are the “augmented Burnett equations” and the “BGK–Burnett equations.” This paper traces the history of the Burnett model and describes some of the recent developments. The relationship between the Burnett equations and the Grad’s 13 moment equations is elucidated by employing the Maxwell–Truesdell–Green iteration. Numerical solutions are provided to assess the accuracy and applicability of Burnett equations for modeling flows in the continuum–transition regime. The important issue of surface boundary conditions is addressed. Computations are compared with the available experimental data, Navier–Stokes calculations, Burnett solutions of other investigators, and DSMC solutions as much as possible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1397256

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Metadata

Authors
Agarwal, R. K., Yun, K.-Y., & Balakrishnan, R.
Venue
Physics of Fluids
Published
2001-10-01
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
3061-3085
ISSN
  • 1070-6631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7666
OpenAlex
W1965750400
Cited by
253
References
14
FWCI
15.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond Navier–Stokes: Burnett equations for flows in the continuum–transition regime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1397256
The paper
Agarwal, R. K., Yun, K.-Y., & Balakrishnan, R. (2001). Beyond Navier–Stokes: Burnett equations for flows in the continuum–transition regime. Physics of Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1397256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.