The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficient use of the correlation consistent basis sets in resolution of the identity MP2 calculations
Abstract
The convergence of the second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) correlation energy with the cardinal number X is investigated for the correlation consistent basis-set series cc-pVXZ and cc-pV(X+d)Z. For the aug-cc-pVXZ and aug-cc-pV(X+d)Z series the convergence of the MP2 correlation contribution to the dipole moment is studied. It is found that, when d-shell electrons cannot be frozen, the cc-pVXZ and aug-cc-pVXZ basis sets converge much slower for third-row elements then they do for first- and second-row elements. Based on the results of these studies criteria are deduced for the accuracy of auxiliary basis sets used in the resolution of the identity (RI) approximation for electron repulsion integrals. Optimized auxiliary basis sets for RI-MP2 calculations fulfilling these criteria are reported for the sets cc-pVXZ, cc-pV(X+d)Z, aug-cc-pVXZ, and aug-cc-pV(X+d)Z with X=D, T, and Q. For all basis sets the RI error in the MP2 correlation energy is more than two orders of magnitude smaller than the usual basis-set error. For the auxiliary aug-cc-pVXZ and aug-cc-pV(X+d)Z sets the RI error in the MP2 correlation contribution to the dipole moment is one order of magnitude smaller than the usual basis set error. Therefore extrapolations towards the basis-set limit are possible within the RI approximation for both energies and properties. The reduction in CPU time obtained with the RI approximation increases rapidly with basis set size. For the cc-pVQZ basis an acceleration by a factor of up to 170 is observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Semiempirical hybrid density functional with perturbative second-order correlation
Grimme, S. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2148954 · Cited by 3,385
Riley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Schwabe, T., & Grimme, S. (2006) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b608478h · Cited by 608
Neese, F., & Valeev, E. F. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100396y · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Weigend, F., Köhn, A., & Hättig, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-02-22
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3175-3183
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2064798852
- Cited by
- 1,981
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient use of the correlation consistent basis sets in resolution of the identity MP2 calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1445115
- The paper
- Weigend, F., Köhn, A., & Hättig, C. (2002). Efficient use of the correlation consistent basis sets in resolution of the identity MP2 calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1445115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.