The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polarization consistent basis sets. II. Estimating the Kohn–Sham basis set limit
Abstract
The performance of the previously proposed polarization consistent basis sets is analyzed at the Hartree–Fock and density functional levels of theory, and it is shown that each step up in basis set quality decreases the error relative to the infinite basis set limit by approximately an order of magnitude. For the largest pc-4 basis set the relative energy error is approximately 10−7, and extrapolation further improves the results by approximately a factor of 2. This provides total atomization energies for molecules with an accuracy of better than 0.01 kJ/mol per atom. The performance of many popular basis sets is evaluated based on 95 atomization energies, 42 ionization potentials and 10 molecular relative energies, and it is shown that the pc-n basis sets in all cases provides better accuracy for a similar or a smaller number of basis functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Cited by
Nonlocal van der Waals density functional: The simpler the better
Vydrov, O. A., & Van Voorhis, T. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3521275 · Cited by 1,312
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Auxiliary Density Matrix Methods for Hartree−Fock Exchange Calculations
Guidon, M., Hutter, J., & VandeVondele, J. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct1002225 · Cited by 608
Neese, F., & Valeev, E. F. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100396y · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 7372-7379
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2134389839
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polarization consistent basis sets. II. Estimating the Kohn–Sham basis set limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1465405
- The paper
- Jensen, F. (2002). Polarization consistent basis sets. II. Estimating the Kohn–Sham basis set limit. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1465405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.