Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polarization consistent basis sets. II. Estimating the Kohn–Sham basis set limit

Jensen, Frank·2002·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The performance of the previously proposed polarization consistent basis sets is analyzed at the Hartree–Fock and density functional levels of theory, and it is shown that each step up in basis set quality decreases the error relative to the infinite basis set limit by approximately an order of magnitude. For the largest pc-4 basis set the relative energy error is approximately 10−7, and extrapolation further improves the results by approximately a factor of 2. This provides total atomization energies for molecules with an accuracy of better than 0.01 kJ/mol per atom. The performance of many popular basis sets is evaluated based on 95 atomization energies, 42 ionization potentials and 10 molecular relative energies, and it is shown that the pc-n basis sets in all cases provides better accuracy for a similar or a smaller number of basis functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1465405

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
116
Issue
17
Pages
7372-7379
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2134389839
Cited by
422
References
4
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polarization consistent basis sets. II. Estimating the Kohn–Sham basis set limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1465405
The paper
Jensen, F. (2002). Polarization consistent basis sets. II. Estimating the Kohn–Sham basis set limit. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1465405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.