The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction
Abstract
Motivated by the protein structure prediction problem, we develop two variants of the Hamiltonian replica exchange methods (REMs) for efficient configuration sampling, (1) the scaled hydrophobicity REM and (2) the phantom chain REM, and compare their performance with the ordinary REM. We first point out that the ordinary REM has a shortage for the application to large systems such as biomolecules and that the Hamiltonian REM, an alternative formulation of the REM, can give a remedy for it. We then propose two examples of the Hamiltonian REM that are suitable for a coarse-grained protein model. (1) The scaled hydrophobicity REM prepares replicas that are characterized by various strengths of hydrophobic interaction. The strongest interaction that mimics aqueous solution environment makes proteins folding, while weakened hydrophobicity unfolds proteins as in organic solvent. Exchange between these environments enables proteins to escape from misfolded traps and accelerate conformational search. This resembles the roles of molecular chaperone that assist proteins to fold in vivo. (2) The phantom chain REM uses replicas that allow various degrees of atomic overlaps. By allowing atomic overlap in some of replicas, the peptide chain can cross over itself, which can accelerate conformation sampling. Using a coarse-gained model we developed, we compute equilibrium probability distributions for poly-alanine 16-mer and for a small protein by these REMs and compare the accuracy of the results. We see that the scaled hydrophobicity REM is the most efficient method among the three REMs studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · Cited by 7,096
Cited by
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives
Earl, D. J., & Deem, M. W. (2005) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b509983h · Cited by 1,313
Using collective variables to drive molecular dynamics simulations
Fiorin, G., Klein, M. L., & Hénin, J. (2013) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2013.813594 · Cited by 1,053
Polarizable Force Field for Peptides and Proteins Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator
Lopes, P. E. M., Huang, J., Shim, J., Luo, Y., Li, H., Roux, B., & MacKerell, A. D. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400781b · Cited by 386
Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1448 · Cited by 184
“…of new starting configurations and addition of a biasing potential to promote also dissociation of the bound complex in Hamiltonian replica exchange (H-REMD) simulations 119 it was possible to sample sufficient association and dissociation events to generate a Markov model for the binding process.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Fukunishi, H., Watanabe, O., & Takada, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-05-22
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9058-9067
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2055648985
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1472510
- The paper
- Fukunishi, H., Watanabe, O., & Takada, S. (2002). On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1472510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.