The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Novel generalized Born methods
Abstract
The generalized Born (GB) model is a simple continuum dielectric model for the calculation of molecular electrostatic solvation energies. It is a pairwise approximation to the solution of the Poisson equation for continuum electrostatic solvation. Key to the GB method is the calculation of Born radii for every atom in the system. We introduce two new methods for determining Born radii. The first is a two-parameter grid-based method that uses nearly the same molecular volume that is used in conventional Poisson calculations. The second is a five-parameter analytical method that utilizes a molecular volume built from a superposition of atomic functions. The analytical method, distinct from the grid-based algorithm, is amenable to force-based calculations, e.g., energy minimization and molecular dynamics. Unlike other Born radii methods, both algorithms employ a new empirically determined correction term that includes energetic effects beyond the Coulomb field approximation. With this correction term, the grid-based algorithm generally yields Born radii with greater than 0.99 correlation versus converged numerically derived Poisson Born radii. The analytical method reproduces Born radii with approximately 0.95 correlation versus Poisson-derived Born radii. With respect to absolute solvation energies, the grid-based method achieves an overall 1.3% error versus converged Poisson solutions for a set of 3029 single-chain proteins obtained from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. On the other hand, the analytic method delivers modest 2–4 % errors versus the Poisson solutions for the same data set. Results concerning absolute solvation energies of RNA and relative solvation energies in two sets of protein conformations are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CHARMM‐GUI: A web‐based graphical user interface for CHARMM
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G., & Im, W. (2008) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20945 · Cited by 9,284
Onufriev, A., Bashford, D., & Case, D. A. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20033 · Cited by 2,507
Force Generation in Kinesin Hinges on Cover-Neck Bundle Formation
Hwang, W., Lang, M. J., & Karplus, M. (2008) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2007.11.008 · Cited by 161
CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed
Hwang, W., Austin, S. L., Blondel, A., Boittier, E. D., Boresch, S., Buck, M., Buckner, J., Caflisch, A., Chang, H.-T., Cheng, X., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04100 · Cited by 136
Self-citationElder, L. H., & Onufriev, A. V. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02263 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M. S., Salsbury, F. R., & Brooks, C. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-06-22
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 10606-10614
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1984015691
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel generalized Born methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1480013
- The paper
- Lee, M. S., Salsbury, F. R., & Brooks, C. L. (2002). Novel generalized Born methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1480013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.