The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polarization consistent basis sets. III. The importance of diffuse functions
Abstract
A sequence of diffuse functions to be used in connections with the previously defined polarization consistent basis sets are proposed based on energetic criteria and results for molecular properties. At the Hartree–Fock level the addition of a single set of diffuse s- and p-functions significantly improves the convergence of calculated electron affinities. A corresponding analysis at the density functional level indicates that only systems with high electron affinities have well-defined basis set limits with common exchange-correlation functionals that have electron self-interaction errors. The majority of reported density functional calculations of electron affinities appear to be artifacts of the limited basis set used. The good agreement with experiments for such calculations is most likely due to a reasonable modeling of the physics of the anionic species, rather than being a theoretically sound procedure. For molecular properties like dipole and quadrupole moments, and static polarizabilities, the addition of diffuse functions up to d-functions is required to reach the basis set limit in a consistent fashion, but higher order angular momentum functions are significantly less important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Cited by
Nonlocal van der Waals density functional: The simpler the better
Vydrov, O. A., & Van Voorhis, T. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3521275 · Cited by 1,312
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Neese, F., & Valeev, E. F. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100396y · Cited by 409
Kozuch, S., Gruzman, D., & Martin, J. M. L. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp1070852 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-11-22
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9234-9240
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2145678380
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polarization consistent basis sets. III. The importance of diffuse functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1515484
- The paper
- Jensen, F. (2002). Polarization consistent basis sets. III. The importance of diffuse functions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1515484
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.