Wall material effects in stationary plasma thrusters. I. Parametric studies of an SPT-100
Abstract
The operation of a laboratory version of the flight-qualified SPT-100 stationary plasma thruster is compared for four different discharge chamber wall materials: a boron nitride–silica mixture (borosil), alumina, silicon carbide, and graphite. The discharge is found to be significantly affected by the nature of the walls: changes in operating regimes, up to 25% variations of the mean discharge current, and over 100% variations of the discharge current fluctuation amplitude are observed between materials. Thrust, however, is only moderately affected. Borosil is the only material tested that allows operating the thruster at a low mean current, low fluctuation level and high thrust efficiency regime. It is suggested that secondary electron emission under electron bombardment is the main cause of the observed differences in discharge operation, except for graphite, where the short-circuit current inside the walls is believed to play a major role. It is also suggested that the photoelectric effect, which has apparently not been given attention before in the Hall thruster literature, could increase the cross-field electron current.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At low energies, the particle-wave nature of the impacting particle starts to emerge and classical mechanics models, like the hard cube or soft cube models, start to fail.
“Regarding the former, it is extremely challenging to obtain a mono-energetic beam of slow neutrals, while regarding the latter, at low energies, the particle-wave nature of the impacting particle starts to emerge and classical mechanics models, like the hard cube or soft cube models 220 , start to fail.”
From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [220]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 242
- Authors
- Gascon, N., Dudeck, M., & Barral, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institute of Fundamental Technological Research (PL)
- Venue
- Physics of Plasmas
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4123-4136
- ISSN
- 1070-664X (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7674
- OpenAlex
- W2090618022
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics of Plasmas (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
- Keywords
- stationary plasma thruster, SPT-100, alumina, silicon carbide, graphite, secondary electron emission, electron bombardment, thrust efficiency, photoelectric effect, short-circuit current, Hall thruster
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review