Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation–Rotation Paradox in the Theory of Nucleation

Reiss, H., Katz, J. L., Cohen, E. R.·1968·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

A detailed examination of the translation–rotation paradox in the theory of nucleation is presented. An earlier conclusion, due to Reiss and Katz, that the paradox is associated with the neglect of the fluctuation of the center of mass of a liquid-drop nucleus is reaffirmed. Transformations of coordinates are performed quantitatively in order to demonstrate this fact. Furthermore, the fluctuation of the center of mass is computed for a lattice model. A new factor not appearing in the classical theory of nucleation appears, but it is much smaller than the factor introduced by Lothe and Pound and only becomes important for large nuclei.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1668256

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Reiss, H., Katz, J. L., & Cohen, E. R.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1968-06-15
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
5553-5560
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2059459297
Cited by
269
References
7
FWCI
16.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translation–Rotation Paradox in the Theory of Nucleation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1668256
The paper
Reiss, H., Katz, J. L., & Cohen, E. R. (1968). Translation–Rotation Paradox in the Theory of Nucleation. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1668256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.