Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theory of the Increase in Rigidity of Rubber during Cure

James, Hubert M., Guth, Eugene·1947·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The rigidity of rubber, considered as a network of flexible molecules with Gaussian configuration functions, can be calculated for a particular sample if one is given a complete description of the molecular network or certain types of statistical description. In particular, it is sufficient to know the distribution of lengths and vector-mean extensions of the segments of the network, or only the latter distribution if it is of Gaussian form. The assumption that the vector-mean extensions have a Gaussian distribution corresponds to a similar postulate in the theory of Wall, and has been applied to a simplified network theory by Flory. In the complete theory it leads to calculation of the same proportionality between the rigidity of the material and the number Ga of segments, per unit volume, in the ``active'' part of the molecular network. However, consideration of the process of cure shows that this assumption cannot be expected to be correct, though it does lead to results of the right order of magnitude. An alternative approach to the problem is based on a study of the increase in rigidity of the material as cure proceeds. It uses a more realistic picture of the process of cure than those hitherto employed, and uses Gaussian distribution functions only where they can be logically justified. The final result is of the same form as that given by the previous theory, except that Ga is replaced by Ba, the number of bonds formed within the molecular network during cure. Since Ba is smaller than Ga by a factor of about two or more, the improved theory leads to the prediction of somewhat lower rigidities per bond formed. Available experimental results of Flory on Butyl rubber vulcanizates do not appear to give an adequate check on the quantitative features of the theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1746626

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
James, H. M., & Guth, E.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1947-09-01
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
669-683
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2087657626
Cited by
432
References
1
FWCI
22.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of the Increase in Rigidity of Rubber during Cure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1746626
The paper
James, H. M., & Guth, E. (1947). Theory of the Increase in Rigidity of Rubber during Cure. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1746626

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.