Advances in Microsphere Insulation Systems
Abstract
Microsphere insulation, typically consisting of hollow glass bubbles, combines in a single material the desirable properties that other insulations only have individually. The material has high crush strength, low density, is noncombustible, and performs well in soft vacuum. Microspheres provide robust, low‐maintenance insulation systems for cryogenic transfer lines and dewars. They also do not suffer from compaction problems typical of perlite that result in the necessity to reinsulate dewars because of degraded thermal performance and potential damage to its support system. Since microspheres are load bearing, autonomous insulation panels enveloped with lightweight vacuum‐barrier materials can be created. Comprehensive testing performed at the Cryogenics Test Laboratory located at the NASA Kennedy Space Center demonstrated competitive thermal performance with other bulk materials. Test conditions were representative of actual‐use conditions and included cold vacuum pressure ranging from high vacuum to no vacuum and compression loads from 0 to 20 psi. While microspheres have been recognized as a legitimate insulation material for decades, actual implementation has not been pursued. Innovative microsphere insulation system configurations and applications are evaluated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The glass bubbles insulation system is predicted to give a thermal performance benefit of 40 to 100% compared to high density (132 kg/m3) perlite powder under typical cold vacuum pressure of 10 to 30 millitorr.
“Note that the typical operating condition for site-built VJ LH2 tanks includes a cold vacuum pressure (CVP) of about 10 to 30 millitorr.Therefore, the bubbles are predicted to give a thermal performance benefit of from 40 to 100% compared to the high density (132 kg/m 3 ) perlite powder traditionally used [20].”
From Energy efficient large-scale storage of liquid hydrogen (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy efficient large-scale storage of liquid hydrogen
Fesmire, J., Swanger, A., Jacobson, J., & Notardonato, W. (2022) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1240/1/012088 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Transient measurement apparatus for material thermal conductivity at ultra-low temperature
Zhao, P., Wang, J., & Wang, Q. (2025) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1327/1/012127 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allen, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Kennedy Space Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allen, M. S.
- Venue
- AIP Conference Proceedings
- Publisher
- AIP
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 710
- Pages
- 619-626
- ISSN
- 0094-243X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138393698
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Aerogels and thermal insulation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Keywords
- hollow glass microspheres, cryogenic insulation, cryogenic transfer lines, dewar, crushing strength, low density, compaction resistance, perlite, thermal performance, compressive loading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review