Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A bond-order analysis of the mechanism for hydrated proton mobility in liquid water

Lapid, Hadas, Agmon, Noam, Petersen, Matt K., Voth, Gregory A.·2005·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Bond-order analysis is introduced to facilitate the study of cooperative many-molecule effects on proton mobility in liquid water, as simulated using the multistate empirical valence-bond methodology. We calculate the temperature dependence for proton mobility and the total effective bond orders in the first two solvation shells surrounding the H5O2+ proton-transferring complex. We find that proton-hopping between adjacent water molecules proceeds via this intermediate, but couples to hydrogen-bond dynamics in larger water clusters than previously anticipated. A two-color classification of these hydrogen bonds leads to an extended mechanism for proton mobility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1814973

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lapid, H., Agmon, N., Petersen, M. K., & Voth, G. A.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2004-12-14
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
14506-14506
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2055036655
Cited by
254
References
0
FWCI
11.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.