Cited by 74Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsVacuum and Plasma ArcsMagnetic confinement fusion research

Self-similarity in Hall plasma discharges: Applications to particle models

Taccogna, Francesco, Longo, Savino, Capitelli, Mario, Schneider, Ralf·2005·Physics of Plasmas

Abstract

Electron transport is a key process in the physics of Hall thruster discharges. Therefore, a kinetic description of the heavy particles (Xe) as well as electrons is required. The ideal numerical model would be a particle model for all the species. Nowadays, such a model is unpractical because it would need too large an amount of computation time due to the very different time scales of electrons and heavy particles dynamics. For this purpose two scalings to speed-up the execution time of a two-dimensional fully kinetic Particle-in-Cell/Monte Carlo Collision simulation of the Hall thruster SPT-100 are proposed. These two different scaling schemes generate self-similar systems of the acceleration channel including the process of secondary electron emission from the dielectric walls. Instead of using the common approach of a smaller neutral and ion mass or a larger vacuum permittivity the channel dimensions are reduced keeping the main dimensionless physics parameters constant. This leads to scaling laws for the input (magnetic field, mass flow rate, current and voltage discharge, etc.) and output parameters obeying self-similarity. This scaling methodology makes the simulation faster and allows improved modeling of electron interactions and fundamental processes. This model has demonstrated its outstanding capability in improving the physics insight into the processes in SPT-100 under the scaling constraints for the geometrical reduction. The application to particle models of different plasma based devices is suggested for such systems where a linearization of the Boltzmann equation is possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1877517

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taccogna, F., Longo, S., Capitelli, M., & Schneider, R.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald (DE)
Venue
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2005-04-22
Volume
12
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1070-664X (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7674
OpenAlex
W2006924175
Cited by
74
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics of Plasmas (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
Hall thruster, self-similarity, scaling laws, particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision simulation, SPT-100, electron transport, secondary electron emission, dielectric walls, linearized Boltzmann equation, computational speed-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review