The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the device physics principles of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells
Abstract
A device physics model has been developed for radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells, in which densely packed nanorods, each having a p-n junction in the radial direction, are oriented with the rod axis parallel to the incident light direction. High-aspect-ratio (length/diameter) nanorods allow the use of a sufficient thickness of material to obtain good optical absorption while simultaneously providing short collection lengths for excited carriers in a direction normal to the light absorption. The short collection lengths facilitate the efficient collection of photogenerated carriers in materials with low minority-carrier diffusion lengths. The modeling indicates that the design of the radial p-n junction nanorod device should provide large improvements in efficiency relative to a conventional planar geometry p-n junction solar cell, provided that two conditions are satisfied: (1) In a planar solar cell made from the same absorber material, the diffusion length of minority carriers must be too low to allow for extraction of most of the light-generated carriers in the absorber thickness needed to obtain full light absorption. (2) The rate of carrier recombination in the depletion region must not be too large (for silicon this means that the carrier lifetimes in the depletion region must be longer than ∼10ns). If only condition (1) is satisfied, the modeling indicates that the radial cell design will offer only modest improvements in efficiency relative to a conventional planar cell design. Application to Si and GaAs nanorod solar cells is also discussed in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Growth of nanowire superlattice structures for nanoscale photonics and electronics
Gudiksen, M. S., Lauhon, L. J., Wang, J., Smith, D. C., & Lieber, C. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415617a · Cited by 2,709
Cited by
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Self-citationSemiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning
Zhu, J., Hsu, C.-M., Yu, Z., Fan, S., & Cui, Y. (2010) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl9034237 · Cited by 873
Dopant profiling and surface analysis of silicon nanowires using capacitance–voltage measurements
Garnett, E. C., Tseng, Y.-C., Khanal, D. R., Wu, J., Bokor, J., & Yang, P. (2009) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.43 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Kayes, B. M., Atwater, H. A., & Lewis, N. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-05-23
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2019107265
- Cited by
- 1,367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the device physics principles of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1901835
- The paper
- Kayes, B. M., Atwater, H. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2005). Comparison of the device physics principles of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1901835
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.