Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 953

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prescription for the design and selection of density functional approximations: More constraint satisfaction with fewer fits

Perdew, John P., Ruzsinszky, Adrienn, Tao, Jianmin, Staroverov, Viktor N., Scuseria, Gustavo E., Csonka, Gábor I.·2005·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

We present the case for the nonempirical construction of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy by the traditional method of “constraint satisfaction” without fitting to data sets, and present evidence that this approach has been successful on the first three rungs of “Jacob’s ladder” of density functional approximations [local spin-density approximation (LSD), generalized gradient approximation (GGA), and meta-GGA]. We expect that this approach will also prove successful on the fourth and fifth rungs (hyper-GGA or hybrid and generalized random-phase approximation). In particular, we argue for the theoretical and practical importance of recovering the correct uniform density limit, which many semiempirical functionals fail to do. Among the beyond-LSD functionals now available to users, we recommend the nonempirical Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) GGA and the nonempirical Tao–Perdew–Staroverov–Scuseria (TPSS) meta-GGA, and their one-parameter hybrids with exact exchange. TPSS improvement over PBE is dramatic for atomization energies of molecules and surface energies of solids, and small or moderate for other properties. TPSS is now or soon will be available in standard codes such as GAUSSIAN, TURBOMOLE, NWCHEM, ADF, WIEN, VASP, etc. We also discuss old and new ideas to eliminate the self-interaction error that plagues the functionals on the first three rungs of the ladder, bring up other related issues, and close with a list of “do’s and don’t’s” for software developers and users.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1904565

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Perdew, J. P., Ruzsinszky, A., Tao, J., Staroverov, V. N., Scuseria, G. E., & Csonka, G. I.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2005-08-08
Volume
123
Issue
6
Pages
62201-62201
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2117307259
Cited by
953
References
5
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.