Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Test-area simulation method for the direct determination of the interfacial tension of systems with continuous or discontinuous potentials

Open access
Gloor, Guy J., Jackson, George, Blas, Felipe J., de Miguel, Enrique·2005·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

A novel test-area (TA) technique for the direct simulation of the interfacial tension of systems interacting through arbitrary intermolecular potentials is presented in this paper. The most commonly used method invokes the mechanical relation for the interfacial tension in terms of the tangential and normal components of the pressure tensor relative to the interface (the relation of Kirkwood and Buff [J. Chem. Phys. 17, 338 (1949)]). For particles interacting through discontinuous intermolecular potentials (e.g., hard-core fluids) this involves the determination of δ functions which are impractical to evaluate, particularly in the case of nonspherical molecules. By contrast we employ a thermodynamic route to determine the surface tension from a free-energy perturbation due to a test change in the surface area. There are important distinctions between our test-area approach and the computation of a free-energy difference of two (or more) systems with different interfacial areas (the method of Bennett [J. Comput. Phys. 22, 245 (1976)]), which can also be used to determine the surface tension. In order to demonstrate the adequacy of the method, the surface tension computed from test-area Monte Carlo (TAMC) simulations are compared with the data obtained with other techniques (e.g., mechanical and free-energy differences) for the vapor-liquid interface of Lennard-Jones and square-well fluids; the latter corresponds to a discontinuous potential which is difficult to treat with standard methods. Our thermodynamic test-area approach offers advantages over existing techniques of computational efficiency, ease of implementation, and generality. The TA method can easily be implemented within either Monte Carlo (TAMC) or molecular-dynamics (TAMD) algorithms for different types of interfaces (vapor-liquid, liquid-liquid, fluid-solid, etc.) of pure systems and mixtures consisting of complex polyatomic molecules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2038827

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Gloor, G. J., Jackson, G., Blas, F. J., & de Miguel, E.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2005-10-01
Volume
123
Issue
13
Pages
134703-134703
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2093913153
Cited by
395
References
54
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test-area simulation method for the direct determination of the interfacial tension of systems with continuous or discontinuous potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2038827
The paper
Gloor, G. J., Jackson, G., Blas, F. J., & de Miguel, E. (2005). Test-area simulation method for the direct determination of the interfacial tension of systems with continuous or discontinuous potentials. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2038827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.