The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On fitting a gold embedded atom method potential using the force matching method
Abstract
We fit a new gold embedded atom method (EAM) potential using an improved force matching methodology which included fitting to high-temperature solid lattice constants and liquid densities. The new potential shows a good overall improvement in agreement to the experimental lattice constants, elastic constants, stacking fault energy, radial distribution function, and fcc/hcp/bcc lattice energy differences over previous potentials by Foiles, Baskes, and Daw (FBD) [Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986)] Johnson [Phys. Rev. B 37, 3924 (1988)], and the glue model potential by Ercolessi et al. [Philos. Mag. A 50, 213 (1988)]. Surface energy was improved slightly as compared to potentials by FBD and Johnson but as a result vacancy formation energy is slightly inferior as compared to the same potentials. The results obtained here for gold suggest for other metal species that further overall improvements in potentials may still be possible within the EAM framework with an improved fitting methodology. On the other hand, we also explore the limitations of the EAM framework by attempting a brute force fit to all properties exactly which was found to be unsuccessful. The main conflict in such a brute force fit was between the surface energy and the liquid lattice constant where both could not be fitted identically. By intentionally using a very large number of spline sections for the pair potential, electron-density function, and embedding energy function, we eliminated a lack of functional freedom as a possible cause of this conflict and hence can conclude that it must result from a fundamental limitation in the EAM framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method
Ercolessi, F., & Adams, J. B. (1994) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 · Cited by 1,455
Cited by
Highly optimized embedded-atom-method potentials for fourteen fcc metals
Sheng, H. W., Kramer, M. J., Cadien, A., Fujita, T., & Chen, M. W. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.134118 · Cited by 532
Discrete plasticity in sub-10-nm-sized gold crystals
Zheng, H., Cao, A., Weinberger, C. R., Huang, J. Y., Du, K., Wang, J., Ma, Y., Xia, Y., & Mao, S. X. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1149 · Cited by 342
A review of advancements in coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations
Joshi, S. Y., & Deshmukh, S. A. (2021) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2020.1828583 · Cited by 266
Surface Chemistry Mediates Thermal Transport in Three-Dimensional Nanocrystal Arrays
Ong, W.-L., Rupich, S. M., Talapin, D. V., McGaughey, A. J. H., & Malen, J. A. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3596 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Grochola, G., Russo, S. P., & Snook, I. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-11-22
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 204719-204719
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2048528541
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On fitting a gold embedded atom method potential using the force matching method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2124667
- The paper
- Grochola, G., Russo, S. P., & Snook, I. K. (2005). On fitting a gold embedded atom method potential using the force matching method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2124667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.