Thermal conduction in ultrathin pure and doped single-crystal silicon layers at high temperatures
Abstract
This work presents the in-plane thermal-conductivity data for pure as well as boron-doped (1.6×1021∕cm3), arsenic-doped (2.3×1020∕cm3), and phosphorus-doped (2.3×1020∕cm3) silicon layers of thickness 30nm in the temperature range of 300–450K. The steady-state Joule heating and electrical resistance thermometry are used to measure the lateral thermal conductivity of suspended silicon layers. Thermal-conductivity data for pure and doped single-crystalline thin silicon layers can be interpreted using thermal-conductivity integral in relaxation-time approximation that accounts for phonon-boundary and phonon-impurity scatterings. No additional fitting parameters are used in this work in contrast with previous studies that required an unusually large phonon-impurity scattering coefficient to fit the thermal-conductivity data for bulk doped silicon to the predictions of the thermal-conductivity integral in relaxation-time approximation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Asheghi and coworkers found that strong impurity scattering effects were more pronounced in bulk samples in comparison to highly boron doped thin films.
“Asheghi and coworkers [12,45] also found that these strong impurity scattering effects were more pronounced in bulk samples in comparison to highly boron doped thin films.”
From Mean Free Path Effects on the Experimentally Measured Thermal Conductivity of Single-Crystal Silicon Microbridges (2013) · cites this paper as [45]
Similarly large values for the impurity scattering coefficient have been routinely used to model highly (>1e19 cm-3) boron doped single-crystal silicon.
“Similarly large values for the impurity scattering coefficient have been routinely used to model highly ( > 1 -10 19 cm 3 ) boron doped single-crystal silicon [12,45].”
From Mean Free Path Effects on the Experimentally Measured Thermal Conductivity of Single-Crystal Silicon Microbridges (2013) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
Phonon-boundary scattering in thin silicon layers
Asheghi, M., Leung, Y. K., Wong, S. S., & Goodson, K. E. (1997) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.119402 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
English, T. S., Phinney, L. M., Hopkins, P. E., & Serrano, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Heat Transfer · doi:10.1115/1.4024357 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, W., & Asheghi, M.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- ORCID
- Asheghi, Mehdi
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-12-15
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2067658811
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
- Keywords
- thermal conductivity, ultrathin silicon layers, monocrystalline silicon, boron doping, arsenic doping, phosphorus doping, phonon boundary scattering, phonon-impurity scattering, relaxation time approximation, Joule heating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review