Cited by 102Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationPhilosophy and History of ScienceScientific Research and Discoveries

The biological frontier of physics

Open access
Phillips, Rob, Quake, Stephen R.·2006·Physics Today

Abstract

Problems at the interface between biology and physics offer unique opportunities for physicists to make quantitative contributions to biology. Equally important, they enrich the discipline of physics by challenging its practitioners to think in new ways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2216960

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The high efficiency of nanoscale energy conversion is primarily because energy modalities possess comparable magnitudes at such small scales, facilitating their interplay and transformation.

    “This is primarily because these energy modalities possess comparable magnitudes at such small scales, facilitating their interplay and transformation (Phillips and Quake, 2006).”

    From Wetware network-based AI: a chemical approach to embodied cognition for robotics and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Phillips and Quake, 2006

    The Figure 2 caption (p. 41) and “Working in a noisy environment” say that thermal, chemical, mechanical, and electrostatic energy scales converge at molecular-machine sizes and that their interplay contributes to molecular behavior. The paper also reports up to 90% efficiency for an ATP synthase experiment, but it does not say that convergence is the primary reason for that efficiency; it says questions remain about how such machines convert energy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At the nanoscale, energy conversion between various forms-such as thermal, mechanical, chemical, and electrical-occurs with remarkable efficiency.

    “At the nanoscale, energy conversion between various forms—such as thermal, mechanical, chemical, and electrical—occurs with remarkable efficiency.”

    From Wetware network-based AI: a chemical approach to embodied cognition for robotics and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Phillips and Quake, 2006

    The figure 2 discussion (p. 41) says thermal, chemical, mechanical, and electrostatic energy scales converge at the size of biological macromolecules; it does not say energy is efficiently converted among all those forms. The ATP synthase discussion reports chemical-to-mechanical conversion with efficiencies up to 90%, supporting the efficiency claim for that example only. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 133, 60 (1931).
  2. H. Itoh et al., Nature 427, 465 (2004).
  3. R. Yasuda et al., Cell 93, 1117 (1998). For an animation, see http://www.k2.phys.waseda.ac.jp/F1movies/F1Step.htm.
  4. O. L. Miller Jr, B. A. Hamkalo, C. A. Thomas Jr, Science 169, 392 (1970).
  5. A. Yildiz et al., Science 300, 2061 (2003).
  6. F. S. Soo, J. A. Theriot, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16233 (2005).
  7. J. L. Borges, Collected Fictions, A. Hurley, trans., Penguin, New York (1999). ᭿ www.physicstoday.org May 2006 Physics Today 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, R., & Quake, S. R.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Physics Today
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
38-43
ISSN
  • 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0699
OpenAlex
W2127321047
Cited by
102
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics Today (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Scientific Research and Discoveries
Keywords
quantitative biology, interdisciplinary research, physics in biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review