CRYOGENIC PROPELLANT BOIL-OFF REDUCTION SYSTEM
Abstract
Lunar missions under consideration would benefit from incorporation of high specific impulse propellants such as LH2 and LO2, even with their accompanying boil-off losses necessary to maintain a steady tank pressure. This paper addresses a cryogenic propellant boil-off reduction system to minimize or eliminate boil-off. Concepts to do so were considered under the In-Space Cryogenic Propellant Depot Project. Specific to that was an investigation of cryocooler integration concepts for relatively large depot sized propellant tanks. One concept proved promising—it served to efficiently move heat to the cryocooler even over long distances via a compressed helium loop. The analyses and designs for this were incorporated into NASA Glenn Research Center's Cryogenic Analysis Tool. That design approach is explained and shown herein. Analysis shows that, when compared to passive only cryogenic storage, the boil-off reduction system begins to reduce system mass if durations are as low as 40 days for LH2, and 14 days for LO2. In addition, a method of cooling LH2 tanks is presented that precludes development issues associated with LH2 temperature cryocoolers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New ZBO projects considering the integration of the cryocooler through a circulated gas loop coupled outside the tank have been proposed.
“Therefore, new ZBO projects considering the integration of the cryocooler through a circulated gas loop coupled outside the tank have been proposed [76].”
From Strategies to recover and minimize boil-off losses during liquid hydrogen storage (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies to recover and minimize boil-off losses during liquid hydrogen storage
Morales-Ospino, R., Celzard, A., & Fierro, V. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113360 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
- Authors
- Plachta, D. W., Christie, R. J., Carlberg, E., Feller, J. R., Weisend, J. G., Barclay, J., Breon, S., Demko, J., DiPirro, M., Kelley, J. P., Kittel, P., Klebaner, A., Zeller, A., Zagarola, M., Van Sciver, S., Rowe, A., Pfotenhauer, J., Peterson, T., & Lock, J.
- Affiliations
- Ames Research Center (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- AIP Conference Proceedings
- Publisher
- AIP
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 985
- Pages
- 1457-1466
- ISSN
- 0094-243X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1634011435
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Rocket and propulsion systems research
- Keywords
- liquid hydrogen, liquid oxygen, lunar missions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review