Cited by 216Spacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesHydrogen Storage and MaterialsPhase Change Materials Research

Strategies to recover and minimize boil-off losses during liquid hydrogen storage

Open access
Morales-Ospino, R., Celzard, A., Fierro, V.·2023·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review consolidates the definition, causes, and state of the art of boil-off hydrogen (BOH) during liquid hydrogen (LH2) storage and compares three mitigation/recovery pathways: zero boil-off (ZBO), reliquefaction, and compression. It argues that minimizing or recovering BOH is critical for deploying LH2, but that cost, cryogenic compressor availability, and limited performance data remain key barriers.

Key findings

  • LH2 offers the highest storage density among physical H2 storage methods, but liquefaction is energy-intensive: it consumes an estimated 30–40% of LH2’s energy content, i.e. 8 MJ/L on a lower heating value basis, and ideally requires about 3.92 kWh/kg LH2 versus 0.31 kWh/kg LNG.
  • BOH is caused by heat leakage, ortho-to-para H2 conversion, sloshing, and flashing; spontaneous ortho-to-para conversion alone can vaporize up to 64% of the original LH2. Reported boil-off rates vary widely: NASA’s 3,200 m³ spherical tanks had ~563 kg/day (~0.25%/day), KHI tanks remained below 0.2%, typical spherical vacuum-insulated Dewars range from 0.3–0.5%/day at 50 m³ to ~0.06%/day at 19,000 m³, and some current LH2 tanks may lose 0.3–3%/day.
  • ZBO combines passive insulation with active cryocooling; NASA’s ZBO proof-of-concept tests were conducted in 1998 and 2000, and ZBO-related reductions of almost 90% have been reported for liquid oxygen and nitrogen storage.
  • Reliquefaction can exploit BOH’s low temperature and para-H2 form: one partial reliquefaction study estimated 3.30 kWh/kg LH2 at a 53 K feed, while another reported 8.8–10.8 kWh/kg LH2 as the reliquefaction-to-generation fraction increased from 10 to 100%.
  • Commercial BOH compression at 20 K does not exist; most commercial non-mechanical compressors require preheating because their minimum inlet temperature is above 258 K, except Air Products’ cryogenic compressor. Examples include Linde ionic compressors up to 900 kg/day at 90 MPa and up to 1,344 kg/day at 50 MPa, with energy consumption up to 3.3 kWh/kg H2 and 70 dB noise at 10 m.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review covering LH2 storage fundamentals, BOH formation mechanisms, and three recovery/mitigation strategies: ZBO, hydrogen reliquefaction, and hydrogen compression.
  • Data/sample: no primary experimental sample; the paper synthesizes prior literature, project reports, and commercial manufacturer data, including tables of conceptual H2 liquefaction plant designs and commercial H2 compressors.
  • Main analysis: qualitative and comparative synthesis of reported boil-off rates, liquefaction performance indicators (SEC, EXE), ZBO test outcomes, reliquefaction studies, and compressor specifications.

Limitations

  • The paper states that available data on performance indicators such as EXE and SEC of current large-scale liquefaction plants are very limited, and that commercial compressor information is incomplete—e.g., Air Products provides no footprint or power consumption data, and Hystorsys provides no alloy information.
  • The paper states that ZBO is sophisticated and currently limited to the spacecraft industry, that BOH compressors operating at 20 K do not exist commercially, and that adsorption compressors are not commercially available and still require more thermal-management sophistication.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, it relies on cited studies, simulations, and manufacturer claims rather than primary validation, and several performance figures come from conceptual designs or company brochures rather than independently verified operation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113360

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

41 of 168 cited sources checked · 25 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    Spherical tanks with a size between 1,100 and 2,300 m3 have boil-off rates of less than 0.1% per day.

    “while spherical tanks with a size between 1,100 and 2,300 m 3 have boil-off rates of less than 0.1 % per day [31,62].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] [31] D. Berstad, S. Gardarsdottir, S. Roussanaly, M. Voldsund, Y. Ishimoto, P. Nekså, Liquid hydrogen as prospective energy carrier: A brief review and discussion of underlying assumptions applied in value chain analysis, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 154 (2022) 111772. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111772. - source
    • cites [62] [62] L. Decker, Liquid Hydrogen Distribution Technology - HYPER closing seminar, Linde. (2020) 27. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    The ZBO storage system appears to be a combination of passive insulation technology (multilayer and cooled shield) and active cooling technology.

    “In an attempt to achieve long-term LH2 storage on orbit, the ZBO storage system appears to be a combination of passive insulation technology (i.e., multilayer and cooled shield) and active cooling technology, as described by Plachta et al.[72].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] [72] D. Plachta, Hybrid thermal control testing of a cryogenic propellant tank, Adv Cryog Eng. 45 (2000) 465-472. -
  • Premisecitation
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    The ZBO system removes heat entering through the tank walls primarily by radiation, using a submerged finned heat exchanger coupled to the cooler.

    “In other words, the ZBO system removes heat entering through the tank walls primarily by radiation, using a submerged finned heat exchanger coupled to the cooler [73].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73] [73] D. Plachta, Results of an Advanced Development Zero Boil-Off Cryogenic Propellant Storage Test, in: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-3837. - source
  • Premisecitation
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    For large propellant tanks in spaceflight, the main challenge is to increase the lift rate to achieve adequate removal of the heat load and, therefore, to achieve ZBO of the cryogen.

    “For large propellant tanks in spaceflight, the main challenge is to increase the lift rate to achieve adequate removal of the heat load and, therefore, to achieve ZBO of the cryogen [71].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71] [71] D. Plachta, J. Stephens, W. Johnson, M. Zagarola, NASA cryocooler technology developments and goals to achieve zero boil-off and to liquefy cryogenic propellants for space exploration, Cryogenics (Guildf). 94 (2018) 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.07.005. - source
  • Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    As a result, a substantial part of the cooling potential associated with gas expansion is lost.

    “As a result, a substantial part of the cooling potential associated with gas expansion is lost [107].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] [107] H.S. Cao, S. Vanapalli, H.J. Holland, C.H. Vermeer, T. Tirolien, H.J.M. Ter Brake, High-Efficiency Joule-Thomson Cryocoolers Incorporating an Ejector, in: D. Miller, R.G.J. Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Cryocooler Conference, ICC Press, Boulder, CO, USA, 2016: pp. 419-426. https://cryocooler.org/CR19toc (accessed April 5, 2023). -
  • May combine two claims. 72
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 117
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Liquid hydrogen (LH2) offers the highest storage density compared to other forms of storage, without requiring a chemical reaction.

    “Liquid hydrogen (LH2) offers the highest storage density compared to other forms of storage, without requiring a chemical reaction.”
    • Also stated in: § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage · boosted
      “Among the various well-established technologies for storing H2 by physical methods, LH2 offers the largest storage capacity per unit volume as well as safety advantages due to its low storage pressure (0.1013-0.6 MPa) [19-21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] [19] A.M. Abdalla, S. Hossain, O.B. Nisfindy, A.T. Azad, M. Dawood, A.K. Azad, Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review, Energy Convers Manag. 165 (2018) 602-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2018.03.088. - source
    • cites [20] [20] Z. Abdin, A. Zafaranloo, A. Rafiee, W. Mérida, W. Lipiński, K.R. Khalilpour, Hydrogen as an energy vector, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109620. - source

      Section 5.2, “Liquid hydrogen,” says liquid-state hydrogen has the highest energy intensity among current hydrogen storage options and contrasts it with liquid carriers that require dehydrogenation. But Table 5 gives a metal hydride a higher volumetric hydrogen density than liquid hydrogen (115 versus 70.8 kg/m³), so the unqualified claim of the highest storage density overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [21] [21] F. Ustolin, N. Paltrinieri, F. Berto, Loss of integrity of hydrogen technologies: A critical review, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 45 (2020) 23809-23840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.021. - source

      The Storage section says liquid hydrogen has a higher density than some other storage solutions, but it identifies cryo-compressed storage—not liquid hydrogen—as achieving the maximum hydrogen density: 80 versus 70.9 kg/m³. Thus the claim that liquid hydrogen has the highest density among storage forms is contrary to the source. The storage comparison distinguishes liquid hydrogen from chemical-bond storage methods. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    The application of LH2 has long been limited to the spacecraft industry because of its high energy consumption.

    “Due to its high energy consumption, the application of LH2 has long been limited to the spacecraft industry [19-21], where budgetary issues or market prices are not a concern [22].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] [19] A.M. Abdalla, S. Hossain, O.B. Nisfindy, A.T. Azad, M. Dawood, A.K. Azad, Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review, Energy Convers Manag. 165 (2018) 602-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2018.03.088. - source
    • cites [20] [20] Z. Abdin, A. Zafaranloo, A. Rafiee, W. Mérida, W. Lipiński, K.R. Khalilpour, Hydrogen as an energy vector, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109620. - source

      Section 5.2 (page unavailable) says hydrogen liquefaction requires energy equivalent to about 35% of the liquid hydrogen’s lower heating value and that cryogenic hydrogen storage is widely used in the space industry. It does not say high energy consumption confined LH2 applications to that industry; it also reports vehicle trials. The claimed historical limitation and its cause therefore go beyond the source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [21] [21] F. Ustolin, N. Paltrinieri, F. Berto, Loss of integrity of hydrogen technologies: A critical review, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 45 (2020) 23809-23840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.021. - source

      The Related equipment section reports that liquefaction requires more energy than compression, and the Mobile systems—Aerospace industry section describes hydrogen use in space missions. The paper does not say that energy demand kept LH2 applications limited to spacecraft for a long period; its Storage section also describes LH2 road delivery. No page number is available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [22] [22] I.A. Hassan, H.S. Ramadan, M.A. Saleh, D. Hissel, Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: Review, analysis and perspectives, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 149 (2021) 111311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111311. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    LH2 storage has safety advantages due to its low storage pressure (0.1013-0.6 MPa).

    “Among the various well-established technologies for storing H2 by physical methods, LH2 offers the largest storage capacity per unit volume as well as safety advantages due to its low storage pressure (0.1013-0.6 MPa) [19-21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] [19] A.M. Abdalla, S. Hossain, O.B. Nisfindy, A.T. Azad, M. Dawood, A.K. Azad, Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review, Energy Convers Manag. 165 (2018) 602-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2018.03.088. - source
    • cites [20] [20] Z. Abdin, A. Zafaranloo, A. Rafiee, W. Mérida, W. Lipiński, K.R. Khalilpour, Hydrogen as an energy vector, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109620. - source

      Table 5 lists low pressure as a merit of liquid-hydrogen storage, and §5.2 describes liquid hydrogen as having the highest energy intensity among current hydrogen-storage options (page numbers unavailable). But our copy does not give the claimed 0.1013–0.6 MPa range or say that liquid hydrogen's low pressure confers a safety advantage; Table 5 instead lists public perception as a safety drawback. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [21] [21] F. Ustolin, N. Paltrinieri, F. Berto, Loss of integrity of hydrogen technologies: A critical review, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 45 (2020) 23809-23840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.021. - source

      The Storage section reports LH2 at atmospheric pressure and lists operating pressures up to 7 bar (0.7 MPa), supporting that it is stored at relatively low pressure. It does not give the claimed upper limit of 0.6 MPa or state that low pressure confers a safety advantage; the Discussion section notes unresolved LH2 explosion risks. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    The flashing phenomenon is quick vaporization occurring over transfer of LH2 from a tank to another with a pressure difference.

    “The reason is the quick vaporization, known as the flashing phenomenon, occurring over the transfer of LH2 from a tank to another with a difference of pressure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] [44] S.A. Sherif, N. Zeytinoglu, T.N. Veziroglu, Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 22 (1997) 683-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00201-7. - source
    • cites [65] [65] M. Aziz, Liquid Hydrogen: A Review on Liquefaction, Storage, Transportation, and Safety, Energies (Basel). 14 (2021) 5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185917. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    The boil-off rate of NASA spherical tanks was estimated to be 563 kg/day, which translates to an evaporation rate of nearly 0.25% per day.

    “The boil-off rate was estimated to be 563 kg/day [30], which translates to an evaporation rate of nearly 0.25 % per day [31].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [30] [30] A.G. Krenn, R.C. Youngquist, S.O. Starr, Annular Air Leaks in a liquid hydrogen storage tank, IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 278 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757899X/278/1/012065. - source
    • cites [31] [31] D. Berstad, S. Gardarsdottir, S. Roussanaly, M. Voldsund, Y. Ishimoto, P. Nekså, Liquid hydrogen as prospective energy carrier: A brief review and discussion of underlying assumptions applied in value chain analysis, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 154 (2022) 111772. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111772. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    Linde estimates cylindrical tanks with capacity 300 m3 can have boil-off rates of less than 0.3% per day, while spherical tanks between 1,100 and 2,300 m3 have boil-off rates of less than 0.1% per day.

    “This company estimates that cylindrical tanks with a capacity of 300 m 3 can have boil-off rates of less than 0.3 % per day, while spherical tanks with a size between 1,100 and 2,300 m 3 have boil-off rates of less than 0.1 % per day [31,62].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] [31] D. Berstad, S. Gardarsdottir, S. Roussanaly, M. Voldsund, Y. Ishimoto, P. Nekså, Liquid hydrogen as prospective energy carrier: A brief review and discussion of underlying assumptions applied in value chain analysis, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 154 (2022) 111772. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111772. - source
    • cites [62] [62] L. Decker, Liquid Hydrogen Distribution Technology - HYPER closing seminar, Linde. (2020) 27. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    Commercial oxide-based catalysts currently used for o- to p-H2 conversion include IONEX® (Fe2O3.2%H2O) and OXISORB® (CrO.SiO2).

    “Commercial oxide-based catalysts currently used for o- to p-H2 conversion include IONEX® (Fe2O3.2%H2O) and OXISORB® (CrO.SiO2) [56].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] [56] M. Hartl, R.C. Gillis, L. Daemen, D.P. Olds, K. Page, S. Carlson, Y. Cheng, T. Hügle, E.B. Iverson, A.J. Ramirez-Cuesta, Y. Lee, G. Muhrer, Hydrogen adsorption on two catalysts for the ortho- to parahydrogen conversion: Cr-doped silica and ferric oxide gel, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 18 (2016) 17281-17293. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP01154C. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    Space travel requires proper storage and management of cryogens under microgravity conditions for long duration missions, which led NASA to implement cryogenic refrigeration systems such as the 20K cryocooler to achieve zero boil-off (ZBO) of LH2.

    “For that purpose, space travel requires proper storage and management of cryogens under microgravity conditions for long duration missions, which led NASA to implement cryogenic refrigeration systems such as the 20K cryocooler to achieve zero boil-off (ZBO) of LH2 [71].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71] [71] D. Plachta, J. Stephens, W. Johnson, M. Zagarola, NASA cryocooler technology developments and goals to achieve zero boil-off and to liquefy cryogenic propellants for space exploration, Cryogenics (Guildf). 94 (2018) 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.07.005. - source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    LH2 transport at lower pressures (near atmospheric) mitigates boil-off formation due to flashing, though at the expense of storing a smaller volume of LH2.

    “LH2 transport at lower pressures (near atmospheric) is a way to mitigate boil-off formation due to flashing, though at the expense of storing a smaller volume of LH2 [44,65].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] [44] S.A. Sherif, N. Zeytinoglu, T.N. Veziroglu, Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 22 (1997) 683-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00201-7. - source
    • cites [65] [65] M. Aziz, Liquid Hydrogen: A Review on Liquefaction, Storage, Transportation, and Safety, Energies (Basel). 14 (2021) 5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185917. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Some authors have suggested that the introduction of an LN2 pre-cooling unit upstream of the liquefaction zone could lead to an increase in EXE of about 50-70% since the mechanical energy of the turbine rotation can be recovered and better cooling is achieved.

    “However, some authors have suggested that the introduction of an LN2 pre-cooling unit upstream of the liquefaction zone could lead to an increase in EXE of about 50-70% [94] since the mechanical energy of the turbine rotation can be recovered and better cooling is achieved [83].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [94] [94] K.D. Timmerhaus, T.M. Flynn, Cryogenic Process Engineering, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [83] [83] S.Z. Al Ghafri, S. Munro, U. Cardella, T. Funke, W. Notardonato, J.P.M. Trusler, J. Leachman, R. Span, S. Kamiya, G. Pearce, A. Swanger, E.D. Rodriguez, P. Bajada, F. Jiao, K. Peng, A. Siahvashi, M.L. Johns, E.F. May, Hydrogen liquefaction: a review of the fundamental physics, engineering practice and future opportunities, Energy Environ Sci. 15 (2022) 2690-2731. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE00099G. - source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The cycles can also include a pre-cooling section with LN2 to reduce compressor work, although it is not mandatory.

    “The cycles can also include a pre-cooling section with LN2 to reduce compressor work, although it is not mandatory [65].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] [65] M. Aziz, Liquid Hydrogen: A Review on Liquefaction, Storage, Transportation, and Safety, Energies (Basel). 14 (2021) 5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185917. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    Although NASA has previously investigated two types of cooling cycles such as the reverse Brayton cycle and the Stirling cycle, the reverse Brayton cycle remains the preferred distributed cooling system.

    “Although NASA has previously investigated two types of cooling cycles such as the reverse Brayton cycle and the Stirling cycle, in which the working fluid circulation directly cools the tank wall [71], the reverse Brayton cycle remains the preferred distributed cooling system [74].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [71] [71] D. Plachta, J. Stephens, W. Johnson, M. Zagarola, NASA cryocooler technology developments and goals to achieve zero boil-off and to liquefy cryogenic propellants for space exploration, Cryogenics (Guildf). 94 (2018) 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.07.005. - source
    • cites [74] [74] D.W. Plachta, W.L. Johnson, J.R. Feller, Zero boil-off system testing, Cryogenics (Guildf). 74 (2016) 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.10.009. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The H2 liquefaction process includes two cooling stages.

    “The H2 liquefaction process includes two cooling stages [81] as can be appreciated graphically in Figure 6a.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [81] [81] M. Choi, W. Jung, S. Lee, T. Joung, D. Chang, Thermal Efficiency and Economics of a Boil-Off Hydrogen Re-Liquefaction System Considering the Energy Efficiency Design Index for Liquid Hydrogen Carriers, Energies (Basel). 14 (2021) 4566. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154566. - source

      The Introduction describes a hydrogen-liquefaction configuration with two sections: precooling and cryogenic liquefaction. It presents this as one proposed configuration, not as a two-stage structure shared by all H₂ liquefaction processes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The J-T expansion cannot be omitted because the expander is not intended for liquefaction but only for cooling since the expander usually does not handle liquid fluids.

    “The J-T expansion cannot be omitted because the expander (Figure 6c) is not intended for liquefaction but only for cooling since the expander usually does not handle liquid fluids [65].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] [65] M. Aziz, Liquid Hydrogen: A Review on Liquefaction, Storage, Transportation, and Safety, Energies (Basel). 14 (2021) 5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185917. - source

      Section 3.1 (page not provided) describes Joule–Thomson expansion through a throttling valve as the liquefaction step in the Linde process. It does not say that J–T expansion cannot be omitted from the arrangement in the citing sentence, or that an expander is used only for cooling because it cannot handle liquid fluids; searches for “expander” and “turbine” found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    An ejector is a work-producing device without moving parts that can enhance the efficiency of the refrigeration cycle by utilizing the high-pressure gas leaving the compressor to increase the cooling capacity of the refrigeration system.

    “An ejector is a work-producing device without moving parts that can enhance the efficiency of the refrigeration cycle by utilizing the high-pressure gas leaving the compressor to increase the cooling capacity of the refrigeration system [92,95].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [92] [92] H.S. Cao, H.J.M. ter Brake, Progress and challenges in utilization of ejectors for cryogenic cooling, Appl Therm Eng. 167 (2020) 114783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114783. - source
    • cites [95] [95] H.S. Cao, L.H. Geng, G. Hammink, T. Tirolien, H.J.M. ter Brake, Performance of a miniature ejector for application in a nitrogen Joule-Thomson cycle: Experimental and numerical analysis, Appl Therm Eng. 186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116357. - source

      The Introduction describes ejectors as work-producing devices that use high-pressure gas to improve cryocooler performance, and Section 2 traces that gas from the compressor to the ejector (pages not provided). The paper says JT cryocoolers have no moving parts, but does not explicitly say this of ejectors. It describes lower evaporator temperature or reduced compressor power, not an increase in cooling capacity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    According to Aasadnia et al., the specific energy consumption (SEC) of liquefaction plants is usually around 10-15 kWh/kg LH2 while EXE values are between 19% and 24%.

    “According to Aasadnia et al. [86], the specific energy consumption (SEC) of liquefaction plants is usually around 10-15 kWh/kg LH2 while EXE values are between 19 % and 24 % [6,86-89].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [86] [86] M. Aasadnia, M. Mehrpooya, Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: A review, Appl Energy. 212 (2018) 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.033. - source
    • cites [6] [6] U. Cardella, L. Decker, H. Klein, Roadmap to economically viable hydrogen liquefaction, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 13329-13338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.068. - source
    • cites [87] [87] A. Naquash, M.A. Qyyum, S. Min, S. Lee, M. Lee, Carbon-dioxide-precooled hydrogen liquefaction process: An innovative approach for performance enhancementEnergy, exergy, and economic perspectives, Energy Convers Manag. 251 (2022) 114947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114947. - source
    • cites [88] [88] Y. Bi, L. Yin, T. He, Y. Ju, Optimization and analysis of a novel hydrogen liquefaction process for circulating hydrogen refrigeration, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 47 (2022) 348364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.012. - source
    • cites [89] [89] S.ZS. Al Ghafri, S. Munro, U. Cardella, T. Funke, W. Notardonato, J.P.M. Trusler, J. Leachman, R. Span, S. Kamiya, G. Pearce, A. Swanger, E.D. Rodriguez, P. Bajada, F. Jiao, K. Peng, A. Siahvashi, M.L. Johns, E.F. May, Hydrogen liquefaction: a review of the fundamental physics, engineering practice and future opportunities, Energy Environ Sci. 15 (2022) 2690-2731. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE00099G. - source

      Section 3.2 (page not provided) reports SEC of 10–15 kWh/kg LH₂ for existing industrial liquefiers, matching that part of the claim. It gives exergy efficiencies of 20–30%, not the claimed 19–24%. (LLM, conf=0.92)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    In industrial H2 liquefaction processes, both types of expanders are used on the refrigeration side.

    “In industrial H2 liquefaction processes, both types of expanders are used on the refrigeration side [89].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] [89] S.ZS. Al Ghafri, S. Munro, U. Cardella, T. Funke, W. Notardonato, J.P.M. Trusler, J. Leachman, R. Span, S. Kamiya, G. Pearce, A. Swanger, E.D. Rodriguez, P. Bajada, F. Jiao, K. Peng, A. Siahvashi, M.L. Johns, E.F. May, Hydrogen liquefaction: a review of the fundamental physics, engineering practice and future opportunities, Energy Environ Sci. 15 (2022) 2690-2731. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE00099G. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The use of ejectors can reduce throttling losses and increase the suction pressure of refrigeration systems, thereby reducing the compression work required for the process.

    “The use of ejectors can reduce throttling losses and increase the suction pressure of refrigeration systems, thereby reducing the compression work required for the process [99].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [99] [99] G. Besagni, Ejectors on the cutting edge: The past, the present and the perspective, Energy. 170 (2019) 998-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.214. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The maximum LH2 production of existing plants worldwide is about 32 ton/day per liquefaction train.

    “The maximum LH2 production of existing plants worldwide is about 32 ton/day per liquefaction train [89].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] [89] S.ZS. Al Ghafri, S. Munro, U. Cardella, T. Funke, W. Notardonato, J.P.M. Trusler, J. Leachman, R. Span, S. Kamiya, G. Pearce, A. Swanger, E.D. Rodriguez, P. Bajada, F. Jiao, K. Peng, A. Siahvashi, M.L. Johns, E.F. May, Hydrogen liquefaction: a review of the fundamental physics, engineering practice and future opportunities, Energy Environ Sci. 15 (2022) 2690-2731. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE00099G. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Alternative solutions to boil-off and outlook

    Gi et al. confirmed the superdense state of H2 not only on MOFs but also on activated carbons at temperatures below 33 K and at 0.1013 MPa.

    “Gi et al. [147] confirmed the superdense state of H2 not only on MOFs but also on activated carbons at temperatures below 33 K and at 0.1013 MPa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [147] [147] H. Gi, Y. Kashiwara, Y. Itoh, K. Sharma, N. Ogita, H. Miyaoka, T. Ogawa, M. Simanullang, L. Prost, T. Ichikawa, Superdense state of the monolayer hydrogen on adsorbent under liquefied temperature, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 48 (2023) 3534-3540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.081. source

      The Introduction and Hydrogen adsorption at 20.4 K section report superdense H₂ on MOF-177 and superactivated carbon MSC-30 below 33 K, including at approximately 0.1013 MPa (reported as 0.1 MPa) at 20.4 K. The Temperature dependence section reports higher pressures for the measurements at 23.3, 26.5, and 30.6 K, so the stated pressure is not supported across the temperatures studied. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    The adsorption compressor concept has been applied to methane compression using metal organic frameworks and activated carbons as adsorbents.

    “More recently, the concept has been applied to methane compression using metal organic frameworks and activated carbons as adsorbents [141].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [141] [141] L. Qin, H. Cao, J. Li, Y. Wu, M. ter Brake, Performance comparison of sorption compressors for methane using metal-organic frameworks and activated carbon as adsorbents, Cryogenics (Guildf). 123 (2022) 103441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2022.103441. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 1. Introduction

    H2 liquefaction requires refrigeration cycles to go from ambient conditions to 20 K, which is an energy-intensive process.

    “However, H2 liquefaction requires refrigeration cycles to go from ambient conditions to 20 K, which is an energy-intensive process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 1. Introduction

    Boil-off hydrogen (BOH) is the result of evaporation of LH2, primarily due to heat leakage into the cryogenic tank.

    “Boil-off hydrogen (BOH) is the result of the evaporation of LH2, primarily due to heat leakage into the cryogenic tank.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    The energy consumption of H2 liquefaction is estimated to be 30-40% of the energy content of LH2, i.e., 8 MJ/L on a lower heating value basis.

    “The energy consumption of H2 liquefaction is estimated to be 30-40 % of the energy content of LH2 [22,27,28], i.e., 8 MJ/L on a lower heating value basis [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [22] [22] I.A. Hassan, H.S. Ramadan, M.A. Saleh, D. Hissel, Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: Review, analysis and perspectives, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 149 (2021) 111311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111311. - source
    • cites [27] [27] Z. Yanxing, G. Maoqiong, Z. Yuan, D. Xueqiang, S. Jun, Thermodynamics analysis of hydrogen storage based on compressed gaseous hydrogen, liquid hydrogen and cryo- - compressed hydrogen, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 44 (2019) 16833-16840. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.04.207. - source
    • cites [28] [28] H. Barthelemy, M. Weber, F. Barbier, Hydrogen storage: Recent improvements and industrial perspectives, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 7254-7262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.178. - source
    • cites [29] [29] D.J. Durbin, C. Malardier-Jugroot, Review of hydrogen storage techniques for on board vehicle applications, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 38 (2013) 14595-14617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.058. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    H2 has the advantage of having the highest gravimetric capacity.

    “However, H2 has the advantage of having the highest gravimetric capacity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    LH2 storage is associated with unavoidable evaporation of a fraction of LH2, known as boil-off, which results in process inefficiency and energy losses.

    “BOH is an undesirable but somewhat unavoidable effect occurring in cryogenic tanks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    LH2 has a lower volumetric energy density than common liquid fuels such as gasoline or diesel.

    “Although LH2 is the most densified version of all physical H2 storage methods, its volumetric energy density is still lower than that of other common liquid fuels, such as gasoline or diesel, as illustrated in Figure 1b.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] [22] I.A. Hassan, H.S. Ramadan, M.A. Saleh, D. Hissel, Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: Review, analysis and perspectives, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 149 (2021) 111311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111311. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    Reliquefaction can be an optimal option for LH2-fueled applications or for LH2 transportation.

    “Reliquefaction can be an optimal option for LH2-fueled applications or for LH2 transportation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.1. Description of hydrogen boil-off phenomenon

    H2 is inherently a difficult molecule to maintain in the liquid state due to its low boiling point and low enthalpy of evaporation (0.45 kJ/g), which is almost 18 times lower than that of LNG.

    “H2 is inherently a difficult molecule to maintain in the liquid state due to its low boiling point, which complicates its liquefaction, but also due to its low enthalpy of evaporation (0.45 kJ/g) that is almost 18 times lower than that of liquefied natural gas (LNG).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    During collection, the gas temperature increases, and thus the required cooling energy depends on the feed temperature of the BOH into the reliquefaction system.

    “During collection, the gas temperature increases, and thus the required cooling energy depends on the feed temperature of the BOH into the reliquefaction system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    The BOH rate of KHI tanks has remained the same, at values below 0.2%, with no sign of deteriorating performance over the past 30 years.

    “In fact, according to company reports, the BOH rate has remained the same, at values below 0.2 %, with no sign of deteriorating performance over the past 30 years [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] [36] Kawasaki Heavy Industries., Japan's Largest Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank. The Intricacies of Keeping Hydrogen at -253°C, (2017). https://answers.khi.co.jp/en/energy-environment/20170227e-01/ (accessed August 30, 2022). -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    The o- to p-H2 conversion usually takes time since the perturbations involving the nuclear spins are small in magnitude and a non-equilibrium mixture may occur.

    “This reaction, known as ortho to para conversion, usually takes time since the perturbations involving the nuclear spins are small in magnitude [47] and a non-equilibrium mixture may occur [48].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] [47] G. Petitpas, S.M. Aceves, M.J. Matthews, J.R. Smith, Para-H2 to ortho-H2 conversion in a full-scale automotive cryogenic pressurized hydrogen storage up to 345 bar, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 39 (2014) 6533-6547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.205. - source
    • cites [48] [48] O.A. evna Boeva, A.A. Odintzov, R.D. Solovov, E.V. Abkhalimov, K.N. Zhavoronkova, B.G. evich Ershov, Low-temperature ortho-para hydrogen conversion catalyzed by gold nanoparticles: Particle size does not affect the rate, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 22897-22902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.187. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    The type of insulation is critical to prevent BOH formation; the insulation design must balance the savings from BOH reduction with the cost of the insulation system.

    “The type of insulation is critical to prevent BOH formation, i.e., the insulation design must be able to balance the savings from BOH reduction with the cost of the insulation system [40].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] K.D. Timmerhaus, Cryogenic Process Engineering, in: R.A.B.T.-E. of P.S. and T. (Third E. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, Elsevier, New York, 2003: pp. 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00156-3. - source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    Venting a fuel is a waste of energy, especially for a gas that is expensive to liquefy.

    “While it is true that this method can be the simplest way to eliminate BOH by avoiding investment in adequate infrastructure to use the gas for other purposes, venting a fuel is a waste of energy, especially for a gas that is expensive to liquefy [68].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] [68] DEMACO, What to do with hydrogen boil-off gas?, (n.d.). https://demacocryogenics.com/blog/what-to-do-with-hydrogen-boil-off-gas/ (accessed May 12, 2022). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    The boil-off rate can be different depending on the sophistication of the Dewar insulation technology, and the shape and the size of the tank.

    “The boil-off rate can be different depending on the sophistication of the Dewar insulation technology, and the shape and the size of the tank.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    Sloshing is the movement of LH2 due to acceleration or deceleration and occurs when impact energy due to movement inside the tank is converted into thermal energy.

    “The movement of LH2 due to acceleration or deceleration is known as sloshing and occurs when the impact energy due to the movement of LH2 inside the tank is converted into thermal energy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    The alternating layers of MLI typically consist of reflective materials (aluminum foil or aluminized Mylar) and low-conductivity insulating materials (fiberglass mat or paper, glass cloth, or nylon netting), all under high vacuum.

    “Typically, the alternating layers consist of reflective materials, namely aluminum foil or aluminized Mylar, and lowconductivity insulating materials, such as fiberglass mat or paper, glass cloth, or nylon netting, all under high vacuum [40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] K.D. Timmerhaus, Cryogenic Process Engineering, in: R.A.B.T.-E. of P.S. and T. (Third E. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, Elsevier, New York, 2003: pp. 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00156-3. - source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    ZBO may not be suitable for all types of applications since cryogenic tank design is quite sophisticated and is currently limited to the spacecraft industry.

    “Nevertheless, ZBO may not be suitable for all types of applications since cryogenic tank design is quite sophisticated and is currently limited to the spacecraft industry.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    The combination of heat leakage, low H2 vaporization temperature, low pressure inside the tank, and transportation of the vessel itself contribute to BOH generation during conventional LH2 storage in Dewars.

    “In summary, the combination of different aspects, such as the heat leakage, low H2 vaporization temperature, low pressure inside the tank, and transportation of the vessel itself, contribute to BOH generation during conventional LH2 storage in Dewars [66,67].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [66] [66] M.D. Paster, R.K. Ahluwalia, G. Berry, A. Elgowainy, S. Lasher, K. McKenney, M. Gardiner, Hydrogen storage technology options for fuel cell vehicles: Well-to-wheel costs, energy efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 36 (2011) 14534-14551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.056. - source
    • cites [67] [67] T.Q. Hua, R.K. Ahluwalia, Off-board regeneration of ammonia borane for use as a hydrogen carrier for automotive fuel cells, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 37 (2012) 1438214392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.013. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    Compression can be a useful method to recover H2 in its gaseous state for applications such as fuel cell vehicle refueling stations or high-pressure buffer storage.

    “Compression can be a useful method to recover H2 in its gaseous state for various applications such as fuel cell vehicle refueling stations or highpressure buffer storage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.1. Description of hydrogen boil-off phenomenon

    Although LH2 evaporation is an endothermic process, the cooling provided by vaporization is insufficient to counteract temperature increase of LH2 due to heat leakage.

    “Although LH2 evaporation is an endothermic process, the cooling provided by vaporization is insufficient to counteract temperature increase of LH2 due to heat leakage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    Normal H2 contains 75% ortho-hydrogen and 25% para-hydrogen.

    “Normal H2 contains two spin isomers of H2 of different composition: 75% ortho-hydrogen (o-H2) and 25% para-hydrogen (p-H2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Liquid Hydrogen storage

    KHI announced completion of the basic design of what the company claims would be the world's largest spherical LH2 tank with a total volume of 11,200 m3 and a H2 storage capacity of 10,000 m3 with a negligible boil-off rate of ≤0.1% per day.

    “KHI also announced the completion of the basic design of what the company claims would be the world's largest spherical LH2 tank with a total volume of 11,200 m 3 and a H2 storage capacity of 10,000 m 3 with a negligible boil-off rate of ≤ 0.1 % per day [38].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] [38] Kawasaki Heavy Industries., Kawasaki Completes Basic Design for World's Largest Class (11,200-cubic-meter) Spherical Liquefied Hydrogen Storage Tank, (2020). https://global.kawasaki.com/en/corp/newsroom/news/detail/?f=20201224\_8018 (accessed August 30, 2022). -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    LH2 tanks are generally of three types: double-jacketed tanks with liquid nitrogen on the outer jacket, super-insulated tanks with reflective powder or multi-layer insulation (MLI), and vapor-cooled shielded (VCS) tanks employing super-insulation.

    “LH2 tanks are generally of three types: i) double-jacketed tanks with liquid nitrogen on the outer jacket, ii) super-insulated tanks with reflective powder or multi-layer insulation (MLI), and iii) vapor-cooled shielded (VCS) tanks employing super-insulation [34,44] as graphically described in Figure 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [34] [34] S.A. Sherif, F. Barbir, T.N. Veziroglu, Towards a Hydrogen Economy, The Electricity Journal. 18 (2005) 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TEJ.2005.06.003. - source
    • cites [44] [44] S.A. Sherif, N. Zeytinoglu, T.N. Veziroglu, Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 22 (1997) 683-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00201-7. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    BOH may be generated by ortho- to para-H2 conversion, heat leaks, sloshing, and flashing.

    “According to Sherif et al. [34,44], BOH may be generated for the following reasons, detailed below:”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen · plain
      “Ortho- to para-H2 conversion”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen · plain
      “Heat leaks (shape and size effect, thermal stratification, thermal overfill, insulation, conduction, radiation, cooling)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [34] [34] S.A. Sherif, F. Barbir, T.N. Veziroglu, Towards a Hydrogen Economy, The Electricity Journal. 18 (2005) 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TEJ.2005.06.003. - source
    • cites [44] [44] S.A. Sherif, N. Zeytinoglu, T.N. Veziroglu, Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 22 (1997) 683-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00201-7. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    H2 venting must be carried out with adequate safety precautions because of the risk of explosion if evaporated H2 meets oxygen or any oxidizing agent.

    “H2 venting must be carried out with adequate safety precautions because of the risk of explosion if the evaporated H2 meets oxygen or any oxidizing agent [68].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] [68] DEMACO, What to do with hydrogen boil-off gas?, (n.d.). https://demacocryogenics.com/blog/what-to-do-with-hydrogen-boil-off-gas/ (accessed May 12, 2022). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    Mitigation strategies incorporating active cooling with multilayer insulation, such as zero boil-off (ZBO), could be an attractive option.

    “To counter this, mitigation strategies incorporating active cooling with multilayer insulation, such as zero boiloff (ZBO), could be an attractive option.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    If H2 liquefaction is carried out without catalytic conversion of o- to p-H2, the ortho isomer will be at a higher concentration than its equilibrium concentration and will spontaneously convert to the para isomer, generating a significant amount of heat.

    “If H2 liquefaction is carried out without catalytic conversion of o- to p-H2, the ortho isomer will be at a higher concentration than its equilibrium concentration and will thus spontaneously convert to the para isomer, generating a significant amount of heat [50].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] [50] M.S. Sadaghiani, M. Mehrpooya, Introducing and energy analysis of a novel cryogenic hydrogen liquefaction process configuration, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 60336050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.136. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    The main drawback of reliquefaction is the need for additional adjacent space for the reliquefaction facility and the relatively high OPEX and CAPEX of the cooling process.

    “The main drawback of this method is the need for additional adjacent space for the reliquefaction facility and the relatively high OPEX and CAPEX of the cooling process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    H2 venting is generally safe for the environment if amounts released are small, but venting can become hazardous when large amounts of BOH are vented into confined spaces.

    “Although H2 venting is generally safe for the environment if the amounts released are small, venting can become hazardous when large amounts of BOH are vented into confined spaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    Boil-off losses due to heat leakage are proportional to the surface-to-volume ratio, so the boil-off rate decreases sharply as the storage tank size increases.

    “Since boil-off losses due to heat leakage are proportional to the surface-to-volume ratio, the boil-off rate decreases sharply as the storage tank size increases [58,59].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [58] [58] L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, for Mobile Applications, Nature. 414 (2001) 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104634. - source
    • cites [59] [59] B.P. Tarasov, M. V. Lototskii, V.A. Yartys', Problem of hydrogen storage and prospective uses of hydrides for hydrogen accumulation, Russ J Gen Chem. 77 (2007) 694-711. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363207040329. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    The choice of the type of recovery strategy depends on the industry, location and application of the LH2, as well as the space available for additional facilities if required.

    “The choice of the type of recovery strategy depends on the industry, location and application of the LH2, as well as the space available for additional facilities if required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    High-conductivity plates produce low-resistance heat paths between the bottom and top of the tank and are therefore able to prevent excessive temperature gradients and pressures.

    “The plates produce low-resistance heat paths between the bottom and top of the tank and are therefore able to prevent excessive temperature gradients and pressures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    BOH must be vented to maintain tank pressure; otherwise, the warmer stratified column of LH2 can potentially cause cavitation and damage the LH2 pump.

    “Therefore, the BOH must be vented to maintain the pressure of the tank, otherwise, the warmer stratified column of LH2 can potentially cause cavitation and damage the LH2 pump [44,64].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] [44] S.A. Sherif, N. Zeytinoglu, T.N. Veziroglu, Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 22 (1997) 683-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00201-7. - source
    • cites [64] [64] T.K. Khurana, B.V.S.S.S. Prasad, K. Ramamurthi, S.S. Murthy, Thermal stratification in ribbed liquid hydrogen storage tanks, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 31 (2006) 2299-2309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.02.032. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1. Description of hydrogen boil-off phenomenon

    The obtained BOH is in equilibrium with the LH2 and the density of each phase does not vary with time.

    “The obtained BOH is in equilibrium with the LH2 and, therefore, the density of each phase does not vary with time [43].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] [43] G. Petitpas, P. Bénard, L.E. Klebanoff, J. Xiao, S. Aceves, A comparative analysis of the cryo-compression and cryo-adsorption hydrogen storage methods, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 39 (2014) 10564-10584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.200. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    Materials with low thermal conductivity or the insertion of long heat transfer paths can reduce convective losses, while various types of radiation shielding can reduce radiation losses.

    “Materials with low thermal conductivity or the insertion of long heat transfer paths (e.g., by reducing the heat flow crosssection) can reduce convective losses, while various types of radiation shielding (e.g., multilayer insulation, boil-off vapor-cooled shields and opacifiers in powder insulation) can reduce radiation losses [40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] K.D. Timmerhaus, Cryogenic Process Engineering, in: R.A.B.T.-E. of P.S. and T. (Third E. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, Elsevier, New York, 2003: pp. 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00156-3. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    It is crucial to ensure that recovery strategies are not overly expensive to maintain a positive OPEX, i.e., the energy used to recover the BOH should not exceed its own cost.

    “However, it is crucial to ensure that the recovery strategies employed are not overly expensive to maintain a positive OPEX, i.e. , the energy used to recover the BOH should not exceed its own cost [69].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [69] [69] G. Petitpas, Boil-off losses along LH2 pathway, Livermore, CA (United States), 2018. https://doi.org/10.2172/1466121. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    State-of-the-art insulation systems are essential to prevent heat leakage into the LH2 storage vessel.

    “State-of-the-art insulation systems are essential to prevent heat leakage into the LH2 storage vessel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    All types of heat transfer are mitigated by providing multilayer insulation with considerably low thermal conductivities.

    “The reason could lie in the fact that all types of heat transfer are mitigated by providing multilayer insulation with considerably low thermal conductivities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    For spherical, vacuum-insulated, double-walled Dewars, boil-off losses are typically between 0.3 and 0.5% per day for 50 m3 storage tanks, 0.2% for 103 m3 tanks, and approximately 0.06% for 19,000 m3 tanks.

    “For spherical, vacuum-insulated, double-walled Dewars, boil-off losses are typically between 0.3 and 0.5 % per day for 50 m 3 storage tanks, 0.2 % for 103 m 3 tanks, and approximately 0.06 % for 19,000 m 3 tanks [60].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] [60] H.H. Ewe, H.-J. Selbach, The Storage of Hydrogen, in: A Solar-Hydrogen Energy System, 1st ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1987: pp. 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1781-4\_11. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    The o- to p-H2 conversion reaction is primarily due to magnetic properties, while the heat of conversion increases as the reaction from o- to p-H2 proceeds.

    “The o- to p-H2 conversion reaction is primarily due to magnetic properties [57], while the heat of conversion increases as the reaction from o- to p-H2 proceeds, as shown in Figure 3b.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] [57] Y. Ishii, Theory of non-dissociative ortho-para conversion on magnetic surfaces, Prog Surf Sci. 21 (1986) 163-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6816(86)90012-2. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Boil-off hydrogen recovery solutions

    Over extended periods, heat transfer is virtually unavoidable with passive cooling alone.

    “However, over extended periods, heat transfer is virtually unavoidable with passive cooling alone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2. Causes of boil-off hydrogen

    BOH rate estimates around 1.5-3% per day have been reported.

    “Similarly, BOH rate estimates around 1.5-3% per day have been reported elsewhere [58,61].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [58] [58] L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, for Mobile Applications, Nature. 414 (2001) 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104634. - source
    • cites [61] [61] F. Zhang, P. Zhao, M. Niu, J. Maddy, The survey of key technologies in hydrogen energy storage, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 41 (2016) 14535-14552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.293. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    In general, the reverse Brayton refrigeration cycle is less efficient than the Claude process, but it has the advantage of simpler and safer operation, because the pressure levels of the helium cycle can be much lower (1 MPa or less).

    “In general, the reverse Brayton refrigeration cycle is less efficient than the Claude process, but it has the advantage of simpler and safer operation, because the pressure levels of the helium cycle can be much lower (1 MPa or less) [85,91].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [85] [85] H.-M. Chang, B.H. Kim, B. Choi, Hydrogen liquefaction process with Brayton refrigeration cycle to utilize the cold energy of LNG, Cryogenics (Guildf). 108 (2020) 103093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2020.103093. - source
    • cites [91] [91] H.-M. Chang, K.N. Ryu, J.H. Baik, Thermodynamic design of hydrogen liquefaction systems with helium or neon Brayton refrigerator, Cryogenics (Guildf). 91 (2018) 6876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.02.007. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The refrigerant in the heat exchanger section is H2 gas from both the cooled expanded gas and the incoming cold BOH.

    “The refrigerant in the heat exchanger section is H2 gas from both the cooled expanded gas and the incoming cold BOH.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Most large-scale H2 liquefaction plants are based on the Claude process with LN2 precooling, as reported by Bi and Ju.

    “Most large-scale H2 liquefaction plants are based on the Claude process with LN2 precooling, as reported by Bi and Ju [109].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [109] [109] Y. Bi, Y. Ju, Conceptual design and optimization of a novel hydrogen liquefaction process based on helium expansion cycle integrating with mixed refrigerant precooling, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 47 (2022) 16949-16963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.202. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The performance indicators for the liquefaction plants presented in Table 1 were obtained from simulations performed primarily via Aspen Plus® or Aspen HYSYS®.

    “The performance indicators for the liquefaction plants presented in Table 1 were obtained from simulations performed primarily via Aspen Plus® or Aspen HYSYS®.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The Claude process configuration avoids the need for LN2 cooling as in the Linde process.

    “The Claude process configuration avoids the need for LN2 cooling as in the Linde process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Liquefaction of gaseous fuels is an inherently energy-intensive process, but it has the advantage of densifying the fluid and thus reducing storage volume and facilitating fluid transport.

    “Liquefaction of gaseous fuels is an inherently energy-intensive process, but it has the advantage of densifying the fluid and thus reducing storage volume and facilitating fluid transport.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Turbine expanders, such as radial flow turbines and axial flow turbines, are commonly used in H2 liquefiers, leading to higher exergy efficiency.

    “Turbine expanders, such as radial flow turbines and axial flow turbines, are commonly used in H2 liquefiers, leading to higher exergy efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The Linde process (Linde-Hampson) is similar to the refrigeration process pioneered by John Dewar, where liquid nitrogen (LN2) is used as the refrigerant.

    “The Linde process, also known as the Linde-Hampson process, is similar to the refrigeration process pioneered by John Dewar, where liquid nitrogen (LN2) is used as the refrigerant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    Although the pressure record inside the Glenn Research Center tank showed a steady decrease demonstrating that the cryocooler could remove part of the heat load, the thermal gradient between the LH2 and the cryocooler was high enough (~8 K) to cause a substantial loss of lift rate and thus an increase in power.

    “Although the pressure record inside the tank showed a steady decrease demonstrating that the cryocooler could remove part of the heat load, the thermal gradient between the LH2 and the cryocooler was high enough (~8 K) to cause a substantial loss of lift rate and thus an increase in power.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The choice of refrigeration cycle process is made based on plant capacity, location and electricity prices.

    “The choice of refrigeration cycle process is made based on plant capacity, location and electricity prices [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] [6] U. Cardella, L. Decker, H. Klein, Roadmap to economically viable hydrogen liquefaction, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 13329-13338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.068. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Of all the fuels that are gaseous under normal conditions, H2 has the lowest boiling point.

    “Of all the fuels that are gaseous under normal conditions, H2 has the lowest boiling point.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    The first ZBO proof-of-concept test was conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center in 1998 and the second was held at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center two years later.

    “The first ZBO proof-of-concept test was conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center in 1998 and the second was held at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center two years later.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] [75] A. Hedayat, L.J. Hastings, C. Bryant, D.W. Plachta, Large scale demonstration of liquid hydrogen storage with zero boiloff, 1276 (2003) 1276-1283. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1472155. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The US Department of Energy (DOE) has set the ultimate energy consumption target for H2 liquefaction to 6 kWh/kg LH2 for large-scale 300 ton/day liquefaction plants.

    “The US Department of Energy (DOE) has set the ultimate energy consumption target for H2 liquefaction to 6 kWh/kg LH2 for large-scale 300 ton/day liquefaction plants [118].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [118] [118] DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office, US Deparment of Energy (DOE) Technical Targets for Hydrogen Delivery, (n.d.). https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-hydrogen-delivery (accessed October 27, 2022). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Refrigeration cycles for H2 liquefaction are currently being extensively studied and modified with the aim of improving the EXE of the process and reducing the SEC of future large-scale liquefaction plants.

    “Refrigeration cycles for H2 liquefaction are currently being extensively studied and modified with the aim of improving the EXE of the process and reducing the SEC of future large-scale liquefaction plants [84].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [84] [84] L. Yin, Y. Ju, Review on the design and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction processes, Frontiers in Energy. 14 (2020) 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708019-0657-4. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Although the DOE target appears to be achievable by implementing process integration and proposed liquefaction design changes, the CAPEX for liquefaction systems remains an open issue, as they account for nearly 50% of the total liquefaction process assuming a plant capacity of 100 ton/day.

    “Although this figure appears to be achievable by implementing process integration and proposed liquefaction design changes, the CAPEX for liquefaction systems remains an open issue [6], as they account for nearly 50% of the total liquefaction process assuming a plant capacity of 100 ton/day [90].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] [6] U. Cardella, L. Decker, H. Klein, Roadmap to economically viable hydrogen liquefaction, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 13329-13338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.068. - source
    • cites [90] [90] U. Cardella, L. Decker, J. Sundberg, H. Klein, Process optimization for large-scale hydrogen liquefaction, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 12339-12354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.167. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The principles of reliquefaction are basically the same as those of liquefaction, except that the feed conditions can change.

    “The principles of reliquefaction are basically the same as those of liquefaction, except that the feed conditions can change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    H2 is liquefied by Joule-Thompson (J-T) expansion down to 20 K at atmospheric pressure.

    “Finally, H2 is liquefied by Joule-Thompson (J-T) expansion down to 20 K at atmospheric pressure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    In the second stage, the pre-cooled H2 passes through a heat exchanger to reach 30 K through a cryocooling system, which operates with refrigeration cycles such as the helium reverse Brayton cycle or the H2 Claude cycle.

    “In the second stage, the pre-cooled H2 passes through a heat exchanger to reach 30 K through a cryocooling system, which operates with refrigeration cycles such as the helium reverse Brayton cycle (possibly with H2 as well, but there is a minimum temperature limitation [80]) or the H2 Claude cycle [79].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [79] [79] M.S. Sadaghiani, M. Mehrpooya, Introducing and energy analysis of a novel cryogenic hydrogen liquefaction process configuration, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 60336050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.136. - source
    • cites [80] [80] H.T. Walnum, D. Berstad, M. Drescher, P. Neksa, H. Quack, C. Haberstroh, J. Essler, Principles for the liquefaction of hydrogen with emphasis on precooling processes, Refrigeration Science and Technology. 2012 (2012) 273-280. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    In the reverse Brayton cycle, cryocooling is performed by a refrigeration cycle using helium as the coolant.

    “In the reverse Brayton cycle, cryocooling is performed by a refrigeration cycle using helium as the coolant, as shown in Figure 6d.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    New ZBO projects considering the integration of the cryocooler through a circulated gas loop coupled outside the tank have been proposed.

    “Therefore, new ZBO projects considering the integration of the cryocooler through a circulated gas loop coupled outside the tank have been proposed [76].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] [76] D.W. Plachta, W.L. Johnson, J.R. Feller, Cryogenic Boil - Off Reduction System Testing, Advanced Cryogenic Engineering. 53B (2008) 1457-66. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Small to mid-size liquefiers typically operate in a helium Brayton cycle or a hydrogen Claude cycle.

    “On the other hand, small to mid-size liquefiers typically operate in a helium Brayton cycle or a hydrogen Claude cycle [115,116].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [115] [115] D.L. Ohlig K, Hydrogen liquefaction, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, n.d. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [116] [116] K. Ohlig, L. Decker, The latest developments and outlook for hydrogen liquefaction technology, AIP Conf Proc. 1573 (2014) 1311-1317. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4860858. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Lee et al.'s partial BOH reliquefaction system for LH2 tankers with hybrid LNG and H2 propulsion had an estimated SEC of 3.30 kWh/kg LH2, lower than characteristic SECs for liquefaction processes from ambient conditions.

    “The SEC was estimated at 3.30 kWh/kg LH2 [129], a value lower than the characteristic SECs for liquefaction processes from ambient conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [129] [129] H. Lee, Y. Shao, S. Lee, G. Roh, K. Chun, H. Kang, Analysis and assessment of partial re-liquefaction system for liquefied hydrogen tankers using liquefied natural gas (LNG)and H2 hybrid propulsion, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 44 (2019) 15056-15071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.277. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    ZBO systems for LH2 storage in spaceflight are being consolidated.

    “ZBO systems for LH2 storage in spaceflight are being consolidated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    Although ZBO was easily achieved at Marshall Space Flight Center, some inefficiencies derived from heat leakage through the pump and bypass loop affected the successful operation of the system.

    “Although ZBO was easily achieved, some inefficiencies derived from heat leakage through the pump and bypass loop affected the successful operation of the system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Another reason is the simplicity of LN2 pre-cooling, which, despite its low heat transfer efficiency, does not have a high investment cost.

    “Another reason is the simplicity of LN2 pre-cooling, which, despite its low heat transfer efficiency, does not have a high investment cost.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    A cryocooler coupled to a cryogenic tank must be able to remove the amount of heat load necessary to maintain the tank at the desired temperature.

    “A cryocooler coupled to a cryogenic tank must be able to remove the amount of heat load necessary to maintain the tank at the desired temperature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Cao and ter Brake identified four main categories of ejector use in refrigeration systems.

    “Cao and ter Brake [92] identified four main categories of ejector use in refrigeration systems:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [92] [92] H.S. Cao, H.J.M. ter Brake, Progress and challenges in utilization of ejectors for cryogenic cooling, Appl Therm Eng. 167 (2020) 114783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114783. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Numerous designs have been proposed to reduce both the CAPEX and OPEX of liquefaction plants and, consequently, the cost of the H2 production chain.

    “Numerous designs have been proposed to reduce both the CAPEX and OPEX of liquefaction plants and, consequently, the cost of the H2 production chain [90].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [90] [90] U. Cardella, L. Decker, J. Sundberg, H. Klein, Process optimization for large-scale hydrogen liquefaction, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 12339-12354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.167. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Several refrigeration processes can be used for H2 liquefaction, including the Linde process, the Claude process, and the reverse Brayton cycle.

    “Several refrigeration processes can be used for H2 liquefaction, including the Linde process, the Claude process, and the reverse Brayton cycle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    In the first cooling stage (precooling), the H2 feed gas is cooled to around 80 K.

    “In the first cooling stage, also called precooling, the H2 feed gas is cooled to a temperature of around 80 K.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    A reliquefaction system must have suitable volumetric capacity to handle the actual boil-off generation rate.

    “Second, a reliquefaction system must have the suitable volumetric capacity to handle the actual boil-off generation rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The Claude process was first developed by Georges Claude in the early 20th century.

    “The Claude process was first developed by Georges Claude in the early 20 th century [93].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [93] [93] S. Krasae-in, J.H. Stang, P. Neksa, Development of large-scale hydrogen liquefaction processes from 1898 to 2009, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 35 (2010) 4524-4533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.109. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    H2 must not only be below 200 K, but its pressure must also be reasonably high before passing through the valve for successful liquefaction.

    “As a result, H2 must not only be below 200 K, but its pressure must also be reasonably high before passing through the valve for successful liquefaction [91].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] [91] H.-M. Chang, K.N. Ryu, J.H. Baik, Thermodynamic design of hydrogen liquefaction systems with helium or neon Brayton refrigerator, Cryogenics (Guildf). 91 (2018) 6876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.02.007. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The p-H2 content after liquefaction processes is between 95% and 98%.

    “The p-H2 content after liquefaction processes is between 95 % and 98 % [85].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] [85] H.-M. Chang, B.H. Kim, B. Choi, Hydrogen liquefaction process with Brayton refrigeration cycle to utilize the cold energy of LNG, Cryogenics (Guildf). 108 (2020) 103093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2020.103093. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    SEC values below 10 kWh/kg LH2 and EXE values close to 50% are higher than those of existing H2 liquefaction plants, suggesting that, despite being merely theoretical estimates, they already give an idea of how much room for improvement there is in actual liquefaction plants.

    “SEC values below 10 kWh/kg LH2 and EXE values close to 50 % are higher than those of existing H2 liquefaction plants, suggesting that, despite being merely theoretical estimates, they already give an idea of how much room for improvement there is in actual liquefaction plants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    H2 liquefaction can be divided into several steps: H2 compression, pre-cooling, cryocooling and liquefaction.

    “H2 liquefaction can be divided into several steps, namely H2 compression, pre-cooling, cryocooling and liquefaction [80].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] [80] H.T. Walnum, D. Berstad, M. Drescher, P. Neksa, H. Quack, C. Haberstroh, J. Essler, Principles for the liquefaction of hydrogen with emphasis on precooling processes, Refrigeration Science and Technology. 2012 (2012) 273-280. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    H2 must be cooled to a temperature 90 K lower than natural gas (i.e., a boiling point of 110 K), which implies the use of more efficient thermally insulated tanks to store the liquid.

    “As an example, H2 must be cooled to a temperature 90 K lower than natural gas (i.e., a boiling point of 110 K), which implies the use of more efficient thermally insulated tanks to store the liquid [78].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] [78] O. Muragishi, S. Inatsu, R. Uraguchi, K. Yamashiro, T. Imai, T. Ohashi, T. Shimogaki, T. Yoshida, T. Koumoto, Hydrogen Transportation - Development of Liquefied Hydrogen Carrier, Kawasaki Technical Description No 182. (2021). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    H2 can be an alternative refrigerant, but helium is preferred because it has a lower boiling point and can therefore reach temperatures below 20 K in the gaseous state.

    “H2 can be an alternative refrigerant, but helium is preferred because it has a lower boiling point and can therefore reach temperatures below 20 K in the gaseous state [91].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] [91] H.-M. Chang, K.N. Ryu, J.H. Baik, Thermodynamic design of hydrogen liquefaction systems with helium or neon Brayton refrigerator, Cryogenics (Guildf). 91 (2018) 6876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.02.007. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Reverse Brayton cycles can have various configurations depending on the arrangement and number of heat exchangers.

    “Reverse Brayton cycles can have various configurations depending on the arrangement and number of heat exchangers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    The ZBO approach based on cooling the cryogenic fluid in the tank was abandoned in search of a better system to integrate the cryocooler for application in larger tanks.

    “While each test had a purpose, the ZBO approach based on cooling the cryogenic fluid in the tank was abandoned in search of a better system to integrate the cryocooler for application in larger tanks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Rietdijk was the first to suggest the implementation of ejectors in cryogenic cooling systems to generate subatmospheric pressure in a liquid helium evaporator, with the aim of achieving cooling temperatures below 4.2 K.

    “Rietdijk [100] was the first to suggest the implementation of ejectors in cryogenic cooling systems to generate subatmospheric pressure in a liquid helium evaporator, with the aim of achieving cooling temperatures below 4.2 K.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [100] [100] Rietdijk J.A., The Expansion-Ejector, A New Device for Liquefaction and Refrigeration at 4°K and Lower, in: 1966: pp. 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/B9780-08-012409-4.50023-1. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Chang et al. conducted a study to determine the optimal pressure for maximizing the thermodynamic performance of a conventional Linde liquefaction system.

    “Chang et al. [91] thus conducted a study to determine the optimal pressure for maximizing the thermodynamic performance of a conventional Linde liquefaction system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] [91] H.-M. Chang, K.N. Ryu, J.H. Baik, Thermodynamic design of hydrogen liquefaction systems with helium or neon Brayton refrigerator, Cryogenics (Guildf). 91 (2018) 6876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.02.007. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Available data on performance indicators such as EXE and SEC of current large-scale liquefaction plants are very limited.

    “Available data on performance indicators such as EXE and SEC of current large-scale liquefaction plants are very limited [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] [6] U. Cardella, L. Decker, H. Klein, Roadmap to economically viable hydrogen liquefaction, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 13329-13338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.068. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    In Lee et al.'s partial BOH reliquefaction system, the boil-off feed was performed at 53 K due to heat leakage in the pipes.

    “Due to heat leakage in the pipes, the boil-off feed was performed at 53 K to the reliquefaction system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [129] [129] H. Lee, Y. Shao, S. Lee, G. Roh, K. Chun, H. Kang, Analysis and assessment of partial re-liquefaction system for liquefied hydrogen tankers using liquefied natural gas (LNG)and H2 hybrid propulsion, Int J Hydrogen Energy. 44 (2019) 15056-15071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.277. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.1. The Zero Boil-Off concept

    Open issues include the need to increase the lift rate while maintaining the cryogenic system at a practical size and weight suitable for NASA space missions.

    “Open issues include the need to increase the lift rate while maintaining the cryogenic system at a practical size and weight suitable for NASA space missions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    Figure 6b shows a flow chart of the Linde-Hampson process where, in addition to LN2, low-temperature BOH is also used as a refrigerant.

    “Figure 6b shows a flow chart of the Linde-Hampson process where, in addition to LN2, low-temperature BOH is also used as a refrigerant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2. Hydrogen reliquefaction

    The ejector primarily consists of a suction section with a nozzle, a mixing chamber and a diffuser.

    “The ejector, as shown in Figure 1c, primarily consists of a suction section with a nozzle, a mixing chamber and a diffuser.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Nicolas et al. optimized the compressor by modeling and simulating its delivery operation using an axisymmetric 2D geometry in COMSOL Multiphysics under various thermal conditions.

    “In a follow-up study, Nicolas et al. [144] focused on the optimization of the latter compressor by performing a parametric study under a variety of possible thermal conditions by modeling and simulating the delivery operation of the compressor using an axisymmetric 2D geometry in COMSOL Multiphysics®.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [144] [144] V. Nicolas, G. Sdanghi, K. Mozet, S. Schaefer, G. Maranzana, A. Celzard, V. Fierro, Numerical simulation of a thermally driven hydrogen compressor as a performance optimization tool, Appl Energy. 323 (2022) 119628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119628. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Final remarks

    Non-mechanical compressors are attracting attention because they are more compact, quieter, more efficient and less expensive than traditional mechanical compressors.

    “Non-mechanical compressors are attracting a lot of attention because they are more compact, quieter, more efficient and less expensive than traditional mechanical compressors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Types of compressor

    In the LNG industry, boil-off compression is a mature operation.

    “as is the case in the LNG industry, where boil-off compression is a mature operation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    The CHC has a H2 delivery capacity of up to 57 m3/h at 289 K under pressures up to 69 MPa.

    “The CHC has a H2 delivery capacity of up to 57 m 3 /h at 289 K under pressures up to 69 MPa [134].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [134] [134] Air Products, The Cryogenic Hydrogen Compressor System. A Low-Cost Way to Meet Your Production Requirements, (2016). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Giner ELX Inc. has created standard EHC systems with H2 flow rate delivery of either 10 kg/h or 0.5 kg/h, operating at inlet pressures of about 0.1-10 MPa and achievable outlet pressures up to 87.5 MPa.

    “Giner ELX Inc, based in the USA but acquired in 2020 by Plugpower, also headquartered in the USA, has created standard EHC systems with H2 flow rate delivery of either 10 kg/h or 0.5 kg/h, operating at inlet pressures of about 0.1-10 MPa and achievable outlet pressures up to 87.5 MPa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Kinetic studies of adsorption compressors in the field of cryocoolers have been performed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratories in Pasadena, California.

    “In the field of cryocoolers, kinetic studies of adsorption compressors have been performed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratories in Pasadena, California [140].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [140] [140] C.K. Chan, E. Tward, D.D. Elleman, Kinetics of a gas adsorption compressor, Adv Cryog Eng. (1984) 533-534. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.3. Hydrogen compression

    The diffusion of non-mechanical compressors on the markets is not yet sufficient because their maturity levels differ or some lack appropriate H2 delivery capacity for certain high-pressure applications.

    “Unfortunately, their diffusion on the markets is not yet sufficient because the level of maturity of the different types of non-mechanical compressors is different or because some of them do not yet have the appropriate H2 delivery capacity for certain high-pressure applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Giner ELX claimed to have achieved stack efficiencies in the range of 2.0 kWh/kg H2 at 350 MPa and 4.4 kWh/kg H2 at 87.5 MPa.

    “Consequently, it has achieved stack efficiencies in the range of 2.0 kWh/kg H2 at 350 MPa and 4.4 kWh/kg H2 at 87.5 MPa [138].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [138] [138] Giner ELX Inc, Electrochemical Compression, 2019 DOE Hydrgoen and Fuel Cell Program Annual Merit Review. (2019) 1-6. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Final remarks

    An important advantage of H2 reliquefaction is that H2 is already at low temperature, so o- to p-H2 catalytic conversion is not necessary if the reliquefaction process is properly integrated into the cryogenic LH2 tank.

    “An important advantage is that H2 is already at low temperature, so the o- to p-H2 catalytic conversion is not necessary if the reliquefaction process is properly integrated into the cryogenic LH2 tank.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    The ionic compressor 90© has allowable inlet pressures from 0.6 to 20 MPa and an energy consumption of up to 3.3 kWh/kg H2 with a noise level of 70 dB at 10 m.

    “The ionic compressor 90©, for example, has a flexible range of allowable inlet pressures from 0.6 to 20 MPa and an energy consumption of up to 3.3 kWh/kg H2 with a noise level of 70 dB at a distance of 10 m [133].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133] [133] Linde, IC90 / 60 Ionic Compressor Compressor module for gaseous hydrogen refueling station, (2021) 2021. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6. Final remarks

    Most commercially available non-mechanical compressors are not suitable for operating at the boiling temperature of H2, which requires a heater to raise the inlet gas temperature.

    “However, most commercially available non-mechanical compressors are not suitable for operating at the boiling temperature of H2, which requires a heater to raise the inlet gas temperature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    A metal hydride compressor requires thermal management because its operation is driven by absorption/desorption cycles, and Hystorsys compressors use hot and cold water with typical inlet temperatures of 288-298 K (cooling) and 358-368 K (heating).

    “A metal hydride compressor requires thermal management since its operation is driven by absorption/desorption cycles. Hystorsys compressors use hot and cold water for that purpose. Typical inlet temperatures are 288-298 K (cooling) and 358-368 K (heating).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Types of compressor

    The H2 industry is technologically less mature than the LNG industry.

    “Another likely cause is that the growing interest in LH2 as a fuel or energy carrier is more recent than for LNG., i.e., the H2 industry is technologically less mature than LNG.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Alternative solutions to boil-off and outlook

    The use of highly porous adsorbents in cryo-adsorption-based storage systems offers a promising alternative for transporting H2 over long distances while achieving high volumetric density comparable to LH2 and reducing boil-off losses.

    “The use of highly porous adsorbents in cryo-adsorption-based storage systems offers a promising alternative for transporting H2 over long distances while achieving high volumetric density that is comparable to LH2 and reducing boil-off losses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6. Final remarks

    New non-mechanical compressors with inlet gas temperatures near 20 K may be beneficial in advancing LH2 logistics and contributing to the global energy transition.

    “New non-mechanical compressors with inlet gas temperatures near 20 K may be beneficial in advancing LH2 logistics and, in turn, contribute to the global energy transition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Nicolas et al. concluded that increasing convective heat transfer with the surrounding air can reduce the time to reach room temperature by almost 75%.

    “The authors concluded that increasing convective heat transfer with the surrounding air can reduce the time to reach room temperature by almost 75%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [144] [144] V. Nicolas, G. Sdanghi, K. Mozet, S. Schaefer, G. Maranzana, A. Celzard, V. Fierro, Numerical simulation of a thermally driven hydrogen compressor as a performance optimization tool, Appl Energy. 323 (2022) 119628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119628. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6. Final remarks

    The main problem with H2 reliquefaction systems is the cost of liquefaction.

    “The main problem with H2 reliquefaction systems is the cost of liquefaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    LH2 shipping compressors and BOH compressors have already been tested on a 9,000 km journey from the eastern coast of Australia to Kobe Airport Island in Japan in 2020.

    “LH2 shipping compressors and BOH compressors have already been tested on a 9,000 km journey from the eastern coast of Australia to Kobe Airport Island in Japan in 2020.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Skyre Inc. offers smaller capacity EHCs, about 0.6 kg/day.

    “Skyre Inc. offers smaller capacity EHCs, about 0.6 kg/day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6. Final remarks

    H2 compression will play an important role in the deployment of the hydrogen economy because many applications of gaseous H2 require high pressures (>30 MPa).

    “Finally, H2 compression will play an important role in the deployment of the hydrogen economy, since many applications of gaseous H2 require high pressures (> 30 MPa).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Sdanghi et al. built a proof-of-concept compressor based on thermally driven adsorption/desorption cycles using activated carbons with high BET area (≥ 3,000 m2/g).

    “Sdanghi et al. [143] built a proof-of-concept compressor based on thermally driven adsorption/desorption cycles using activated carbons with high BET area (≥ 3,000 m 2 /g).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [143] [143] G. Sdanghi, V. Nicolas, K. Mozet, S. Schaefer, G. Maranzana, A. Celzard, V. Fierro, A 70 MPa hydrogen thermally driven compressor based on cyclic adsorption-desorption on activated carbon, Carbon N Y. 161 (2020) 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.099. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    HyET Hydrogen offers modular designs of electrochemical compressors (EHCs) consisting of various stacks, and the more stacks, the higher the compressor capacity.

    “The Dutch company HyET Hydrogen offers modular designs of electrochemical compressors (EHCs) consisting of various stacks. The more stacks, the higher the compressor capacity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6. Final remarks

    In reliquefaction systems for stationary applications, it must be considered to what extent reliquefaction can be a cost-effective option.

    “In the space industry, budgetary issues are not a concern, while in reliquefaction systems, for example in stationary applications, it must be considered to what extent reliquefaction can be a cost-effective option.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the space industry, budgetary issues are not a concern.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    The single-stage turbo compressor was used to ensure that H2 remained at 20 K in liquid form.

    “The single-stage turbo compressor was used to ensure that H2 remained at 20 K in liquid form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Types of compressor

    Inserting a heat exchanger in front of the compressor is an alternative way to increase BOH temperature, allowing compressors to operate at higher temperatures, but it would imply additional energy expenditure.

    “If BOH compressors evolve sufficiently from an operational and design standpoint, inserting a heat exchanger in front of the compressor (as in Figure 8) is an alternative way to increase the BOH temperature, allowing compressors to operate at higher temperatures. Nonetheless, this would imply additional energy expenditure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    The Skyre EHC, designed and proven for NASA, is based on a patented electrochemical technology and can capture, separate and compress H2 up to 20 MPa from mixed gas streams such as biogas, natural gas reformate, syngas or industrial effluent.

    “Additionally, as it is the differentiating characteristic of EHCs, the system is able to capture, separate and compress H2 up to 20 MPa from a variety of mixed gas streams such as biogas, natural gas reformate, syngas or effluent from a given industrial process [137].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [137] [137] SKYRE, SKYRE H2RENEW, (2019) 1-2. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Adsorption compressors for applications other than H2 compression have been reported in the literature since the 1980s.

    “Adsorption compressors for applications other than H2 compression have already been reported in the literature since the 1980s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Hystorsys standard hydrogen metal hydride compressors can operate with capacities ranging from 1 Nm3/h up to 12 Nm3/h (8.5 to 25.5 kg/day) and achieve pressure levels up to 25 MPa.

    “Standard hydrogen metal hydride compressors from Hystorsys can operate with capacities ranging from 1 Nm³/h up to 12 Nm³/h (8.5 to 25.5 kg/day) and achieve pressure levels up to 25 MPa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [139] [139] HYSTORSYS, HYMEHC hydrogen compressor, (n.d.). https://www.hystorsys.no/mhcompressor/ (accessed September 5, 2022). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    In Sdanghi et al.'s cyclic experiments, a cooling and heating step was performed from an initial pressure of 8 MPa at 77 K to a final pressure of 70 MPa in a single step when heating the compressor to 315 K.

    “Cyclic experiments comprising a cooling and a heating step were performed from an initial pressure of 8 MPa at 77 K to a final pressure of 70 MPa in a single step when heating the compressor to 315 K.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [143] [143] G. Sdanghi, V. Nicolas, K. Mozet, S. Schaefer, G. Maranzana, A. Celzard, V. Fierro, A 70 MPa hydrogen thermally driven compressor based on cyclic adsorption-desorption on activated carbon, Carbon N Y. 161 (2020) 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.099. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Linde offers standardized compressors with H2 delivery capacities of up to 900 kg/day at a maximum pressure of 90 MPa and up to 1,344 kg/day at a maximum pressure of 50 MPa.

    “The company offers a broad portfolio of standardized compressors with H2 delivery capacities of up to 900 kg/day at a maximum pressure of 90 MPa and up to 1,344 kg/day at a maximum pressure of 50 MPa [132].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [132] [132] Linde, Linde Hydrogen Fueltech. Tomorrow´s fuel today, (2020). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 4.3. Hydrogen compression

    Non-mechanical compressors are considered a potential alternative to traditional mechanical compressors due to their compactness, negligible noise, superior efficiency, and lack of wear and moving parts.

    “Due to their compactness, negligible noise, superior efficiency, lack of wear and moving parts, non-mechanical compressors are considered a potential alternative to traditional mechanical compressors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    The BOH was stored on board after in situ liquefaction in a 116 m-long, 8,000-ton cylindrical tank in a 1,250-m3 double-jacketed, vacuum-insulated, single tank.

    “The BOH was stored on board after in situ liquefaction in a 116 m-long, 8,000ton cylindrical tank in a 1,250-m 3 double-jacketed, vacuum-insulated, single tank [131].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [131] [131] F. La Porta, H. Usuda, Hydrogen compression. Charting a path for hydrogen transportation, 63. (2022). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    A centrifugal compressor for BOH, designed by Atlas Copco Gas and Process, was set up to operate at 20 K in the LH2 shipping pilot study conducted by Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI).

    “A centrifugal compressor for BOH, designed by Atlas Copco Gas and Process, was set up to operate at 20 K in this LH2 shipping pilot study conducted by Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Types of compressor

    H2 poses additional operational challenges at cryogenic temperatures, such as material embrittlement or gas seal reliability.

    “but also that H2 poses additional operational challenges, such as material embrittlement or gas seal reliability at this temperature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    HyET Hydrogen offers standardized EHCs with H2 flowrate capacities ranging from 2 to 600 kg/day and an outlet pressure of almost 90 MPa.

    “This company thus offers a wide variety of standardized EHCs with several H2 flowrate capacities ranging from 2 to 600 kg/day and an outlet pressure of almost 90 MPa [135].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [135] [135] HyET Hydrogen, HyET H2 Compression and Purification systems, (2020). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Air Products' Cryogenic Hydrogen Compressor (CHC) system has a pump claimed to operate with both vapor and liquid phases without an additional compressor.

    “The US company Air Products is proposing a Cryogenic Hydrogen Compressor (CHC) system with a pump claimed to able to operate with both vapor and liquid phases without the need of an additional compressor [134].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [134] [134] Air Products, The Cryogenic Hydrogen Compressor System. A Low-Cost Way to Meet Your Production Requirements, (2016). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5. Alternative solutions to boil-off and outlook

    Cryo-adsorption storage allows for higher H2 densities than LH2 and extends the dormancy period to higher temperatures than traditional cryogenic tanks.

    “This approach allows for even higher H2 densities than those achievable by LH2 and extends the dormancy period to higher temperatures than traditional cryogenic tanks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    According to HyET Hydrogen, OPEX is around 0.30-0.60 USD/kg H2 and CAPEX between 150 and 300 USD/kg H2/day, compared to a CAPEX of 1000-1500 USD/kg H2/day for mechanical compressors.

    “According to HyET Hydrogen, OPEX and CAPEX are very competitive with mechanical compressors: OPEX is around 0.30-0.60 USD/kg H2 and CAPEX between 150 and 300 USD/kg H2/day (compared to a CAPEX of 1000-1500 USD/kg H2/day for mechanical compressors) [136].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [136] [136] HyET Hydrogen, Cost effective hydrogen processing technologies. Presentation., 2020. (n.d.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrMVOibGfGA (accessed August 17, 2022). -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Hystorsys compressors are based on a flexible and expandable design, so additional compression chambers can be added to increase volumetric capacity if more H2 delivery capacity is required.

    “The compressors are based on a flexible and expandable design. Hence, if more H2 delivery capacity is required, additional compression chambers can be added to increase the volumetric capacity[139].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [139] [139] HYSTORSYS, HYMEHC hydrogen compressor, (n.d.). https://www.hystorsys.no/mhcompressor/ (accessed September 5, 2022). -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Alternative solutions to boil-off and outlook

    The temperature at which H2 desorption starts depends on the textural properties of the MOFs, resulting in an extended dormancy time for the tank system.

    “The temperature at which H2 desorption starts depends on the textural properties of the MOFs, resulting in an extended dormancy time for the tank system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146] [146] J. Park, J. Ha, R. Muhammad, H.K. Lee, R. Balderas-Xicohtencatl, Y. Cheng, A.J. Ramirez-Cuesta, B. Streppel, M. Hirscher, H.R. Moon, H. Oh, 20 K H2Physisorption on Metal-Organic Frameworks with Enhanced Dormancy Compared to Liquid Hydrogen Storage, ACS Appl Energy Mater. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c01907. - source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.3. Hydrogen compression

    Compressing BOH at cryogenic temperatures is a major engineering challenge because current commercial compressors hardly work at 20 K and because energy is required for possible upstream H2 heating.

    “However, compressing BOH at cryogenic temperatures is a major engineering challenge, not only because current commercial compressors hardly work with fluids at such a low temperature (20 K), but also because of the energy required for possible upstream H2 heating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: BOH compressors operating at 20 K do not exist commercially.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Alternative solutions to boil-off and outlook

    Park et al. observed that van der Waals interactions between adsorbate and adsorbent in these MOFs result in superdense H2 adsorption at 20 K, compensating for the adsorbent skeleton and resulting in a volumetric storage capacity comparable to LH2 tanks (~96%).

    “They observed that van der Waals interactions between the adsorbate and adsorbent in these MOFs results in superdense H2 adsorption at 20 K, compensating for the space occupied by the adsorbent skeleton, resulting in a volumetric storage capacity comparable to that of LH2 tanks ( ∼ 96 %).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146] [146] J. Park, J. Ha, R. Muhammad, H.K. Lee, R. Balderas-Xicohtencatl, Y. Cheng, A.J. Ramirez-Cuesta, B. Streppel, M. Hirscher, H.R. Moon, H. Oh, 20 K H2Physisorption on Metal-Organic Frameworks with Enhanced Dormancy Compared to Liquid Hydrogen Storage, ACS Appl Energy Mater. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c01907. - source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 4.3.1. Commercial hydrogen compressors

    Ionic liquid compressors have the lowest noise level among mechanical compressors and operate almost at isothermal compression because they have fewer moving parts and mechanical seals.

    “While mechanical compressors are known to be noisy due to their numerous moving parts, ionic liquid compressors have the lowest noise level among mechanical compressors as they have fewer moving parts and mechanical seals, so they operate almost at isothermal compression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Types of compressor

    The boiling temperature of H2 is nearly 90 K lower than that of natural gas.

    “One possible reason is that the boiling temperature of H2 is nearly 90 K lower than that of natural gas”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
154 of 154
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deploying LH2 technology in the transportation and energy sector is critical to help decarbonize the global economy.

    “Given the critical importance of deploying LH2 technology in the transportation and energy sector to help decarbonize the global economy, in this paper we present a comprehensive review of the LH2 storage issue”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three BOH solutions (zero boil-off, reliquefaction, and compression) are the key strategies to minimize or recover boil-off hydrogen.

    “the three different recovery strategies to minimize hydrogen evaporation or recover boil-off hydrogen, namely: zero boiloff, hydrogen reliquefaction, and commercial solutions for boil-off hydrogen compression.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Heat leakage into cryogenic tanks will eventually occur, especially when LH2 storage is planned for long periods.

    “Despite the technological evolution of cryogenic tanks in terms of thermal insulation and materials used to construct the tanks, heat leakage will eventually occur, especially when LH2 storage is planned for long periods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Thermal conductivity values of multi-layer insulation can be as low as 10 to 50 μW/mK at temperatures between 20 and 300 K.

    “Thermal conductivity values of this insulation mode can be as low as 10 to 50 μW/mK at temperatures between 20 and 300 K.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Regardless of the BOH rate, the need for special design and more robust tank insulation to prevent LH2 evaporation can increase the cost and the weight of the tank and thus reduce the gravimetric energy density of the system.

    “Regardless of the BOH rate, the need for special design and more robust tank insulation to prevent LH2 evaporation can increase the cost and the weight of the tank and thus reduce the gravimetric energy density of the system.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    BOH compressors operating at 20 K do not exist commercially.

    “However, to our knowledge, BOH compressors operating at 20 K do not exist commercially.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the space industry, budgetary issues are not a concern.

    “In the space industry, budgetary issues are not a concern”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No adsorption compressor is commercially available today.

    “To our knowledge, no adsorption compressor is commercially available today.”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Giner's stated flow rates conflict with Table 2

    Major

    The text lists Giner systems delivering either 10 or 0.5 kg/h; even the smaller rate is 12 kg/day. Table 2 instead gives their maximum flow rate as 0.42 kg/day.

  • HyET capacity range differs between text and table

    Minor

    The text gives 600 kg/day as the upper end of HyET's compressor capacities, whereas Table 2 lists a HyET range extending to 2000 kg/day.

  • Lower SEC values described as higher than existing plants

    Minor

    The paper says conceptual designs with SEC below 10 kWh/kg have higher performance-indicator values than existing plants, but it gives existing plants an SEC of 10-15 kWh/kg. The conceptual SEC values are lower, not higher.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Krenn, 2017, Annular Air Leaks in a liquid hydrogen storage tank, IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 278, 10.1088/1757-899x/278/1/012065 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2017, Kawasaki Heavy industries., Japan's largest liquid hydrogen storage tank, The Intricacies of Keeping Hydrogen at -253°C
  3. Boeva, 2017, Low-temperature ortho–para hydrogen conversion catalyzed by gold nanoparticles: particle size does not affect the rate, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 42, 22897, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.187 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Decker, 2020, Liquid hydrogen distribution technology - HYPER closing seminar, Linde, 27
  5. Hedayat, 2003, Large scale demonstration of liquid hydrogen storage with zero boiloff, 1276, 1276
  6. Sadaghiani, 2017, Introducing and energy analysis of a novel cryogenic hydrogen liquefaction process configuration, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 42, 6033, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.136 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Walnum, 2012, Principles for the liquefaction of hydrogen with emphasis on precooling processes, Refrigeration Science and Technology, 273
  8. Al Ghafri, 2022, Hydrogen liquefaction: a review of the fundamental physics, engineering practice and future opportunities, Energy Environ Sci, 15, 2690, 10.1039/d2ee00099g · DOI · Paper page
  9. D.L. Ohlig K, Hydrogen liquefaction, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, [n.d].
  10. Yin, 2020, Process optimization and analysis of a novel hydrogen liquefaction cycle, Int J Refrig, 110, 219, 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.11.004 · DOI
  11. La Porta, 2022, Hydrogen compression, Charting a path for hydrogen transportation, 63
  12. Park, 2022, 20 K H2Physisorption on metal-organic frameworks with enhanced dormancy compared to liquid hydrogen storage, ACS Appl Energy Mater

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales-Ospino, R., Celzard, A., & Fierro, V.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Fierro, V.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
182
Pages
113360
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4377223905
Cited by
216
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 6
FWCI
26.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-22-PEHY-0007)
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
  • European Regional Development Fund (PEPRH2-SOLHYD, TALiSMAN2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
Keywords
liquid hydrogen storage, cryogenic storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review