The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transparent and conducting electrodes for organic electronics from reduced graphene oxide
Abstract
The deposition and optoelectronic properties of reduced graphene oxide thin films are described. Thin films with thicknesses ranging from 1–10nm have been deposited by the vacuum filtration method. The conductivity of the thin films can be varied over six orders of magnitude by varying the filtration volume of the graphene oxide aqueous suspension while maintaining the transmittance between 60%–95%. In addition, enhancement in the conductance through Cl doping is demonstrated. The combination of the reduction and Cl treatments make the reduced graphene oxide thin films sufficiently conducting to incorporate them as the hole collecting electrode in proof of concept organic photovoltaic devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L., & Kim, P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04235 · Cited by 13,435
Cited by
Georgakilas, V., Perman, J. A., Tucek, J., & Zboril, R. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500304f · Cited by 2,147
Mechanical Properties of Monolayer Graphene Oxide
Suk, J. W., Piner, R. D., An, J., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn101781v · Cited by 1,194
Tien, H.-W., Huang, Y.-L., Yang, S.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., & Ma, C.-C. M. (2011) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.022 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Eda, G., Lin, Y.-Y., Miller, S., Chen, C.-W., Su, W.-F., & Chhowalla, M.
- Venue
- Applied Physics Letters
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-06-09
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 23
- ISSN
- 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
- 1077-3118
- OpenAlex
- W2034343644
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
