The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uniformly convergent n-tuple-ζ augmented polarized (nZaP) basis sets for complete basis set extrapolations. I. Self-consistent field energies
Abstract
We present a sequence of n-tuple-ζ augmented polarized (nZaP) basis sets designed for extrapolations of both self-consistent field (SCF) and correlation energies to the complete basis set (CBS) limit. These nZaP basis sets (n=2–6) are formulated to give consistent errors throughout the Periodic Table (e.g., a consistent of ∼1 mhartree/electron error for the 2ZaP SCF energy and a consistent of ∼1.4 μhartree/electron error for the 6ZaP SCF energy). The SCF energy exhibits systematic convergence to the CBS limit: ESCF(nZaP)≈ESCF(CBS)+Ae−an. A single parameter, a=6.30, describes the 2ZaP through 6ZaP errors of H through Xe within 10%. The SCF rms basis set truncation errors of H through Xe are 33.5mEh, 4.58mEh, 0.82mEh, 0.18mEh, and 0.047mEh for 2ZaP, 3ZaP, 4ZaP, 5ZaP, and 6ZaP, respectively. Linear extrapolations of the (2,3)ZaP, (3,4)ZaP, (4,5)ZaP, and (5,6)ZaP calculations (all with a=6.30) reduce these errors by an order of magnitude to 0.24mEh, 0.056mEh, 0.020mEh, and 0.005mEh, respectively. A test set of 34 atoms, ions, and molecules gives similar results, and the associated test set of 25 chemical energy differences also gives comparable absolute accuracy. However, the cancellation of errors between reactant and product is lost by extrapolation. As a result, these chemical energy differences show a more modest two-to-fourfold improvement with extrapolation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I. D., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N. P. D., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803 · Cited by 1,560
Neese, F., & Valeev, E. F. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100396y · Cited by 409
Segmented Contracted Basis Sets Optimized for Nuclear Magnetic Shielding
Jensen, F. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct5009526 · Cited by 355
Molecular basis of C-S bond cleavage in the glycyl radical enzyme isethionate sulfite-lyase
Dawson, C. D., Irwin, S. M., Backman, L. R. F., Le, C., Wang, J. X., Vennelakanti, V., Yang, Z., Kulik, H. J., Drennan, C. L., & Balskus, E. P. (2021) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.03.001 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhong, S., Barnes, E. C., & Petersson, G. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-11-14
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 184116-184116
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2025874194
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uniformly convergent n-tuple-ζ augmented polarized (nZaP) basis sets for complete basis set extrapolations. I. Self-consistent field energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3009651
- The paper
- Zhong, S., Barnes, E. C., & Petersson, G. A. (2008). Uniformly convergent n-tuple-ζ augmented polarized (nZaP) basis sets for complete basis set extrapolations. I. Self-consistent field energies. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3009651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.