The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electronic continuum model for molecular dynamics simulations
Open accessAbstract
A simple model for accounting for electronic polarization in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is discussed. In this model, called molecular dynamics electronic continuum (MDEC), the electronic polarization is treated explicitly in terms of the electronic continuum (EC) approximation, while the nuclear dynamics is described with a fixed-charge force field. In such a force-field all atomic charges are scaled to reflect the screening effect by the electronic continuum. The MDEC model is rather similar but not equivalent to the standard nonpolarizable force-fields; the differences are discussed. Of our particular interest is the calculation of the electrostatic part of solvation energy using standard nonpolarizable MD simulations. In a low-dielectric environment, such as protein, the standard MD approach produces qualitatively wrong results. The difficulty is in mistreatment of the electronic polarizability. We show how the results can be much improved using the MDEC approach. We also show how the dielectric constant of the medium obtained in a MD simulation with nonpolarizable force-field is related to the static (total) dielectric constant, which includes both the nuclear and electronic relaxation effects. Using the MDEC model, we discuss recent calculations of dielectric constants of alcohols and alkanes, and show that the MDEC results are comparable with those obtained with the polarizable Drude oscillator model. The applicability of the method to calculations of dielectric properties of proteins is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields
Bedrov, D., Piquemal, J.-P., Borodin, O., MacKerell, A. D., Roux, B., & Schröder, C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00763 · Cited by 639
Zeron, I. M., Abascal, J. L. F., & Vega, C. (2019) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5121392 · Cited by 346
Li, Z., Rao, H., Atwi, R., Sivakumar, B. M., Gwalani, B., Gray, S., Han, K. S., Everett, T. A., Ajantiwalay, T. A., Murugesan, V., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36647-1 · Cited by 292
Dommert, F., Wendler, K., Berger, R., Delle Site, L., & Holm, C. (2012) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201100997 · Cited by 277
Binding of divalent cations to acetate: molecular simulations guided by Raman spectroscopy
Mendes de Oliveira, D., Zukowski, S. R., Palivec, V., Hénin, J., Martinez-Seara, H., Ben-Amotz, D., Jungwirth, P., & Duboué-Dijon, E. (2020) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d0cp02987d · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Leontyev, I. V., & Stuchebrukhov, A. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-02-25
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 085102-085102
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2043328360
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic continuum model for molecular dynamics simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3060164
- The paper
- Leontyev, I. V., & Stuchebrukhov, A. A. (2009). Electronic continuum model for molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.