The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A long-range-corrected density functional that performs well for both ground-state properties and time-dependent density functional theory excitation energies, including charge-transfer excited states
Abstract
We introduce a hybrid density functional that asymptotically incorporates full Hartree–Fock exchange, based on the long-range-corrected exchange-hole model of Henderson et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 128, 194105 (2008)]. The performance of this functional, for ground-state properties and for vertical excitation energies within time-dependent density functional theory, is systematically evaluated, and optimal values are determined for the range-separation parameter, ω, and for the fraction of short-range Hartree–Fock exchange. We denote the new functional as LRC-ωPBEh, since it reduces to the standard PBEh hybrid functional (also known as PBE0 or PBE1PBE) for a certain choice of its two parameters. Upon optimization of these parameters against a set of ground- and excited-state benchmarks, the LRC-ωPBEh functional fulfills three important requirements: (i) It outperforms the PBEh hybrid functional for ground-state atomization energies and reaction barrier heights; (ii) it yields statistical errors comparable to PBEh for valence excitation energies in both small and medium-sized molecules; and (iii) its performance for charge-transfer excitations is comparable to its performance for valence excitations. LRC-ωPBEh, with the parameters determined herein, is the first density functional that satisfies all three criteria. Notably, short-range Hartree–Fock exchange appears to be necessary in order to obtain accurate ground-state properties and vertical excitation energies using the same value of ω.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Improta, R., Santoro, F., & Blancafort, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00444 · Cited by 499
Influence of Triplet Instabilities in TDDFT
Peach, M. J. G., Williamson, M. J., & Tozer, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200651r · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohrdanz, M. A., Martins, K. M., & Herbert, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-02-05
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 054112-054112
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1976798212
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A long-range-corrected density functional that performs well for both ground-state properties and time-dependent density functional theory excitation energies, including charge-transfer excited states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3073302
- The paper
- Rohrdanz, M. A., Martins, K. M., & Herbert, J. M. (2009). A long-range-corrected density functional that performs well for both ground-state properties and time-dependent density functional theory excitation energies, including charge-transfer excited states. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3073302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.