Fundamental Equations of State for Parahydrogen, Normal Hydrogen, and Orthohydrogen
Abstract
If the potential for a boom in the global hydrogen economy is realized, there will be an increase in the need for accurate hydrogen thermodynamic property standards. Based on current and anticipated needs, new fundamental equations of state for parahydrogen, normal hydrogen, and orthohydrogen were developed to replace the existing property models. To accurately predict thermophysical properties near the critical region and in liquid states, the quantum law of corresponding states was applied to improve the normal hydrogen and orthohydrogen formulations in the absence of available experimental data. All three equations of state have the same maximum pressure of 2000MPa and upper temperature limit of 1000K. Uncertainty estimates in this paper can be considered to be estimates of a combined expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor of 2 for primary data sets. The uncertainty in density is 0.04% in the region between 250 and 450K and at pressures up to 300MPa. The uncertainties of vapor pressures and saturated liquid densities vary from 0.1% to 0.2%. Heat capacities are generally estimated to be accurate to within 1%, while speed-of-sound values are accurate to within 0.5% below 100MPa.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most implementations of the reference Helmholtz equations of state for parahydrogen and orthohydrogen developed by Leachman et al. require the user to independently evaluate Equations (1) and (2) to determine the ortho-para ratio at each temperature.
“Unfortunately, most implementations of the reference Helmholtz equations of state for parahydrogen and orthohydrogen developed by Leachman et al. [64] require the user to independently evaluate Equations ( 1) and (2) to determine the ortho-para ratio at each temperature.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [64]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 78 · Cited by 822
- Authors
- Leachman, J. W., Jacobsen, R. T., Penoncello, S. G., & Lemmon, E. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Idaho (US)
- Idaho State University (US)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 721-748
- ISSN
- 0047-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7845
- OpenAlex
- W2004936374
- Cited by
- 822
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 116 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
- Keywords
- hydrogen, parahydrogen, ortho-hydrogen, normal hydrogen, equation of state, liquid hydrogen, critical region, density, vapor pressure, saturated liquid density, heat capacity, sound velocity, uncertainty estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review