The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultrafine metal particles
Abstract
In this paper we present a novel and versatile technique for the production of ultrafine metal particles by evaporation from a temperature-regulated oven containing a reduced atmosphere of an inert gas. An extensive investigation of particles of oxidized Al, with diameters of 3 to 6 nm, has been performed. We have also studied ultrafine particles of Mg, Zn, and Sn produced in the same manner. A supplementing investigation has been carried out for particles of Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Ga, as well as larger Al particles, produced by ’’conventional’’ inert-gas evaporation from a resistive filament. Diameter as a function of evaporation rate, inert-gas pressure, and the kind of inert gas are reported. Crystalline particles smaller than 20 nm look almost spherical in the electron microscope, while larger ones often display pronounced crystal habit. Size distributions have been investigated in detail, and consistently the logarithm of the particle diameter has a Gaussian distribution to a high precision for the smallest sizes, whereas larger particles deviate from such a simple behavior. A statistical growth model, based on the Central Limit Theorem, has been formulated for liquidlike coalescence of particles; this theory accounts satisfactorily for all our data, as well as for most size distributions published in the literature. Applications of the model to colloids, discontinuous films, and supported catalysts are discussed. By comparing size distributions for particles produced by a variety of techniques we found a number of empirical rules for the width of the distributions, as defined by a (geometric) standard deviation σ. For crystalline inert-gas- evaporated particles we obtained consistently 1.36?σ?1.60; for coalescing islands in discontinuous films we found 1.22?σ?1.34; and similar rules are applicable to colloids, supported catalysts, and to ultrafine droplets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Whole powder pattern modelling
Scardi, P., & Leoni, M. (2002) · Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0108767301021298 · Cited by 538
Optical properties of ultrafine gold particles
Granqvist, C. G., & Hunderi, O. (1977) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.16.3513 · Cited by 513
Self-citationNanoclusters deposited on surfaces
Binns, C. (2001) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/s0167-5729(01)00015-2 · Cited by 441
Laser ablation of a platinum target in water. II. Ablation rate and nanoparticle size distributions
Nichols, W. T., Sasaki, T., & Koshizaki, N. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2390641 · Cited by 122
Cristoforetti, G., Pitzalis, E., Spiniello, R., Ishak, R., Giammanco, F., Muniz-Miranda, M., & Caporali, S. (2012) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.084 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Granqvist, C. G., & Buhrman, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1976-05-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2200-2219
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2069630030
- Cited by
- 1,613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafine metal particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.322870
- The paper
- Granqvist, C. G., & Buhrman, R. A. (1976). Ultrafine metal particles. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.322870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.